- Joined
- Mar 6, 2006
- Messages
- 1,281
- Reaction score
- 10
No, the biggest mistake was him thinking the money was his or that he should receive a portion of it. He should have given it to the homeowner. He is a contractor hired to perform a job on her house. Why should he be entitled to any of the cash? In addition, why would any of the heirs to Dunn be entitled to any either? The house was sold since the depression era and the new homeowner, upon purchasing the house, owns everything in it.
No, the biggest mistake was him thinking the money was his or that he should receive a portion of it. He should have given it to the homeowner. He is a contractor hired to perform a job on her house. Why should he be entitled to any of the cash? In addition, why would any of the heirs to Dunn be entitled to any either? The house was sold since the depression era and the new homeowner, upon purchasing the house, owns everything in it.
Actually the heirs should.I just thought about that (that he was a contractor)...I agree, the home owner should have got all of it...
Actually the heirs should.
Unless we know, that it was unintentionally left their. If your great great great grandfather owned shares of stock, and you were the only heir, wouldn't you deserve getting it.Usually when you purchase a house, you get the house and whatever is left inside it that the previous owners did not take with them.
If I hide $200k in my house today and 75 years later, and two owners from now, find my stash, does that mean my heirs should be entitled to that cash?
Usually when you purchase a house, you get the house and whatever is left inside it that the previous owners did not take with them.
The money belongs to the new owner legally. I saw it on a TV show![]()
*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators