See the patbenetar.com decision:
http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2004/d2004-0001.html
OK, it still rankles my sensibilities for proper TLD use that a .com domain wins on the basis of noncommercial fair use, but it nevertheless is a good decision to cite in all future cases involving legitimate fan sites being challenged by the celebrity named in their domains. Since I run a couple of those myself, I'm naturally interested in such cases.
I don't understand why Pat Benetar (or her management) suddenly chose to fight against her name being used on a fan site when she knew about the site for years and didn't object earlier, only requesting a link to her official site. This would seem to allow a laches defense to be raised, though this is not officially provided for in the UDRP. Also, celebrities suing their fans would seem to be an ill-advised move for P.R., regardless of their legal merits.
http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2004/d2004-0001.html
OK, it still rankles my sensibilities for proper TLD use that a .com domain wins on the basis of noncommercial fair use, but it nevertheless is a good decision to cite in all future cases involving legitimate fan sites being challenged by the celebrity named in their domains. Since I run a couple of those myself, I'm naturally interested in such cases.
I don't understand why Pat Benetar (or her management) suddenly chose to fight against her name being used on a fan site when she knew about the site for years and didn't object earlier, only requesting a link to her official site. This would seem to allow a laches defense to be raised, though this is not officially provided for in the UDRP. Also, celebrities suing their fans would seem to be an ill-advised move for P.R., regardless of their legal merits.