- Joined
- Aug 23, 2004
- Messages
- 549
- Reaction score
- 0
Firstly, I completely understand why the majority of UDRP cases go to the complainent - most of these are blatant TM issues.
Did anyone catch the decision from a single panelist on the UDRP for Tinkerbell.com?
Tinkerbell.com
The respondent was even found to have registered the domain in bad faith but the complainent failed to prove the respondent was using the domain in bad faith.
Did anyone catch the decision from a single panelist on the UDRP for Tinkerbell.com?
Tinkerbell.com
The respondent was even found to have registered the domain in bad faith but the complainent failed to prove the respondent was using the domain in bad faith.