John - I have great respect for your skills and the work you do.
I am sure that does not come over most the time - because of my combatitive style.
I only have trouble with what I honestly see as your failure to recognize certain facts.
If I remember correctly - you won that fiver (UK = 8.37 dollars) from me because I did not believe you - that the US would be so stupid as to allow different businesses to register same trademarks for similar product.
I am really sorry that I did not believe you - it was like being told the Pope was not Catholic.
I knew, of course, all about honest prior use; that a similar business may continue use - UNREGISTERED.
It would obviously promote confusion to give more than one the same registered trademark for similar product/service.
The thinking "Let us pretend they are in a different country" is so pathetic that it is laughable - it makes the whole system a Zip Code Lottery.
"...owning a federal trademark registration on the Principal Register provides several advantages, e.g., a legal presumption of the registrant's ownership of the mark and the registrant's exclusive right to use the mark nationwide on or in connection with the goods and/or services listed in the registration;"
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/tac/doc/basic/register.htm
Added to this, those on the Supplemental Register have the right to use the registered trademark symbol - and you have a right pigs breakfast.
Ha ha ha "exclusive right" - funny or what?
I always try my best to get to the root of a problem.
The question you have to ask is this: Upon reading, jt.com was clearly overreach - why was it not thrown out?
The WIPO UDRP system is clearly biased towards their customers - they are corrupt.
The quote at the end of my posting was made to highlight "the mission of WIPO".
Their mission is to "promote intellectual-property rights" which they do to the detriment of the publics rights - demonstrably so.