I have three developed domains in .co.uk that are pure one-word generics of niche products. Each is hosted in the US. The sites have all original content and are updated frequently. They are all only a year old or so.
Each one is on one of the first if not the first page on Google.co.uk, but they are all buried in Google.com.
Therein lies my questions:
1. Am I being specifically devalued by G.com for my choice in TLD in places outside the UK, or is it a level playing ground but more about the fact that there is a ton more competition for SE ranking when all other geographies are mixed in?
2. Would I do better globally (or not) with a .com that adds a related word and makes them imperfect and less authoritative to the visitor?
I am leaning toward assuming that the latter part of question 1 is actually what is true, and therefore changing nothing and hoping I will move up globally.
Thanks!
Each one is on one of the first if not the first page on Google.co.uk, but they are all buried in Google.com.
Therein lies my questions:
1. Am I being specifically devalued by G.com for my choice in TLD in places outside the UK, or is it a level playing ground but more about the fact that there is a ton more competition for SE ranking when all other geographies are mixed in?
2. Would I do better globally (or not) with a .com that adds a related word and makes them imperfect and less authoritative to the visitor?
I am leaning toward assuming that the latter part of question 1 is actually what is true, and therefore changing nothing and hoping I will move up globally.
Thanks!