closed Dioxygen google listed

[Biggie]

Picked up.... Please appraise on value

Dioxygen.com

.net and info are taken for this name

 

[Biggie]

Are DNF members boycotting biggedon?

 

[Biggie]

Still no comments

 

[mastmnds]

hmm if its is yahoo listed slap it on ebay other than that i dunno what to tell u.

 

[Packrat]

Did you pick that up on a drop? Hard to see any commercial value in selling a biochemical compound. You might want to offer it to the owner of the .net or perhaps sit on it for a while...you never know

Luck...

 

[Biggie]

Originally posted by Packrat
Did you pick that up on a drop? Hard to see any commercial value in selling a biochemical compound. You might want to offer it to the owner of the .net or perhaps sit on it for a while...you never know

Luck...

Thanks for responding. Coincidentally,I do have "Bio" related
domain names.

"BioStartups.com"
"BSML.us" (Bioinformatics Standard Markup Language)
"BlackSkin.us"
"BlackSkin.org"
"itAdvances.com"
Also had "BioTerror.net".....Sold :sad:

 

[Packrat]

Originally posted by biggedon


Thanks for responding. Coincidentally,I do have "Bio" related
domain names.

"BioStartups.com"
"BSML.us" (Bioinformatics Standard Markup Language)
"BlackSkin.us"
"BlackSkin.org"
"itAdvances.com"
Also had "BioTerror.net".....Sold :sad:

Good price for bioterror.net? I've been grabbing some science/tech related info's and some org's...

 

[Biggie]

Originally posted by lotsofissues
Most threads don't get a response. Have you noticed a characteristic all those domains share?

Sometimes the silly names get more responses than good names

 

[domainAddict]

My "DoNotVisit" got over 120 in 8 minutes

 

[Biggie]

Originally posted by domainAddict
My "DoNotVisit" got over 120 in 8 minutes

To view a thread is one thing, to post a reply to that thread is
another.

 

[President Gringo]

i know how u feel biggedon. I hardly ever get any feedback on my names here, and i don't think my names are that bad. Almost abandoned this forum coz of it.

 

[Biggie]

Originally posted by President Gringo
i know how u feel biggedon. I hardly ever get any feedback on my names here, and i don't think my names are that bad. Almost abandoned this forum coz of it.

It's still a good forum though, not ready to give up on it.

 

[domainAddict]

My point was, that most of threads get only few answers, but then again, my thread received 120 visitors in less than 10 minutes (and only 2 replies). That makes you think.. So many people visiting, but only few actually replying. They should invent something like 5 posts minimum a week, or so. It would lighten things up a bit.

 

[Biggie]

Originally posted by domainAddict
My point was, that most of threads get only few answers, but then again, my thread received 120 visitors in less than 10 minutes (and only 2 replies). That makes you think.. So many people visiting, but only few actually replying. They should invent something like 5 posts minimum a week, or so. It would lighten things up a bit.

Some forums require newbies to reply to a certain number of threads before they are allowed to post themselves.

 

[domainAddict]

Thats not such a bad idea, as long as people dont post bullshit just to pass that quota..

 

[Wot]

I think the main problem is that none of us really know how or how much to appraise. Newbies have no idea and are looking for a lead, old hands have seen OTT appraisals, and probably paid for them only to find that the "appraisers" probably know less than those seeking the appraisal!
Look at GDoms, Mottoes.com- $100,000 buy the .us version for $7, it's available.

CellTelephone.com - $110,00 ,I have the .us version- how much?

We are suffering from a lack of actual sales to give us a lead to determine values. Nearly every domain, apart from the top notch are offered at " Make offer" and the majority of those who express an interest are re-sellers! Only when the when potential buyers are from outside the "community' will you start to see the real value of names.
I have no doubt that this will happen but I think there is a direct link to renewed confidence in technolgy stocks and the fading of the "dotcom revolution" in to the past.
The answer, I wish I knew, but it all looked good 2 years ago, and that is not a long time.
Go with the flow, hold the names 'you' think are good, dump the rubbish and hold on to your hats for the new revolution1

 

[Biggie]

Thanks for your contribution to this thread "dotus"