- Joined
- Feb 17, 2003
- Messages
- 816
- Reaction score
- 0
I have a little situation, and Iââ¬â¢m not sure my best course of action.
I recently negotiated to buy a decent domain name from another party who is located in the US.
We agreed on a price and a transaction was initiated using escrow.com
Agreeing to our terms and "signing" the contracts per say, the transaction went to the next step.
I made payment for the domain in full to escrow, payment was approved and the only thing left was for the owner to transfer the domain.
The problem is, the seller refuses to transfer the domain name because after we initiated the escrow and after I paid for the domain name, he received an offer that was substantially higher then mine. He told me would not sell the domain name to me, unless I paid him more money. I was floored that someone would actually try this. Especially someone who is a part of the domain community.
It is my understanding that using escrow.com is the same as a contract between two parties and if the other breaches that contract they can be held liable.
It is also my understanding that the domain name was legally mine as soon as payment was made. After all, the terms were agreed upon by both parties before the payment step.
Am I wrong in this perception?
What recourses do I have?
I don't want to just give up the transaction and be required to pay the escrow fee because the other party simply won't live up to their end of the agreement.
Also how far would one have to go to fight such a case? Has anyone been in this situation before? Would a carefully worded letter from a reputable lawyer do the trick? Or is my only recourse to take him to court?
The domain name is a moderately expensive one but I'm not sure how economically efficient it is to fight for a domain valued in the low to mid xxxx.
Iââ¬â¢m quite peeved over this so any help would be very appreciated
-Chris
I recently negotiated to buy a decent domain name from another party who is located in the US.
We agreed on a price and a transaction was initiated using escrow.com
Agreeing to our terms and "signing" the contracts per say, the transaction went to the next step.
I made payment for the domain in full to escrow, payment was approved and the only thing left was for the owner to transfer the domain.
The problem is, the seller refuses to transfer the domain name because after we initiated the escrow and after I paid for the domain name, he received an offer that was substantially higher then mine. He told me would not sell the domain name to me, unless I paid him more money. I was floored that someone would actually try this. Especially someone who is a part of the domain community.
It is my understanding that using escrow.com is the same as a contract between two parties and if the other breaches that contract they can be held liable.
It is also my understanding that the domain name was legally mine as soon as payment was made. After all, the terms were agreed upon by both parties before the payment step.
Am I wrong in this perception?
What recourses do I have?
I don't want to just give up the transaction and be required to pay the escrow fee because the other party simply won't live up to their end of the agreement.
Also how far would one have to go to fight such a case? Has anyone been in this situation before? Would a carefully worded letter from a reputable lawyer do the trick? Or is my only recourse to take him to court?
The domain name is a moderately expensive one but I'm not sure how economically efficient it is to fight for a domain valued in the low to mid xxxx.
Iââ¬â¢m quite peeved over this so any help would be very appreciated
-Chris