Hi DNForum Members,
I am writing to bring an important domain issue to your attention,
I have been involved with .com domains for many years, however with .com becoming so competetive I recently turned my attention to my local country code .com.au
As you may or may not know .com.au is very different to the .com name space, the names are more expensive and you must provide a reason for why you are entitled to the domain, either by way of a direct association with the domain, eg you own a business called dnforum it would entitle you to dnforum.com.au, otherwise you would fall under the "close and substantial connection" rule, where you tell them what you intend to use the domain for.
Using my experience in .com, I saw an opportunity in .com.au as well as some loop holes in the rules, I proceeded to register hundreds of domains and send them to parking pages.
The au name space regulator is known as AUDA, you can visit their site at www.auda.org.au
During the last 6 months I have been questioned about many of my domains, had over 100 names deleted and been involved in legal proceedings with AUDA.
In October AUDA made this announcement.
http://www.auda.org.au/news-archive/auda-14102005/
Last friday they released this statement
http://www.auda.org.au/news-archive/news-domain-monetisation/
Later in the day the report was released, and as you can see several public submissions have been made, the majority of which are against parking.
http://www.auda.org.au/reviews/monetisation-2006/
http://www.auda.org.au/pdf/auda-domainmon-public.pdf
The close and substantial connection rule is fairly new, prior to this you had to own the business name or you could not register a domain, basically each business could only have 1 domain.
All of the really good generic names were reserved and sold at an auction by AUDA, because of the history behind the AU name space it has a unique following of supporters who like the fact its different from .com and applaud these policies.
The reason behind my domains being deleted was because of complaints, these AUDA supporters are a vocal group, much in the same way anti spam groups police the spam situation.
If you read their responses you will quickly understand the kind of people I am up against, and as you would imagine they out number the domainers.
I know several local domainers and have made them aware, but many will never know this is up for discussion. It is an unfair situation, AUDA supporters visit the site and know what is going on, domainers dont, and on a local scale domainers are outnumbered, however there are a lot of Australian domainers who only deal in .com currently (fabulous for one).
I hope this thread will reach some more Aussies or for you to pass it to your Aussie friends and business contacts.
As much as I do not want to encourage competition in the AU name space, it is either we open it up or it is completely closed off.
There is also nothing limiting a global response, anyone is entitled to send a response to AUDA on the matter and it would be published.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thanks
Wade
I am writing to bring an important domain issue to your attention,
I have been involved with .com domains for many years, however with .com becoming so competetive I recently turned my attention to my local country code .com.au
As you may or may not know .com.au is very different to the .com name space, the names are more expensive and you must provide a reason for why you are entitled to the domain, either by way of a direct association with the domain, eg you own a business called dnforum it would entitle you to dnforum.com.au, otherwise you would fall under the "close and substantial connection" rule, where you tell them what you intend to use the domain for.
Using my experience in .com, I saw an opportunity in .com.au as well as some loop holes in the rules, I proceeded to register hundreds of domains and send them to parking pages.
The au name space regulator is known as AUDA, you can visit their site at www.auda.org.au
During the last 6 months I have been questioned about many of my domains, had over 100 names deleted and been involved in legal proceedings with AUDA.
In October AUDA made this announcement.
http://www.auda.org.au/news-archive/auda-14102005/
Last friday they released this statement
http://www.auda.org.au/news-archive/news-domain-monetisation/
Later in the day the report was released, and as you can see several public submissions have been made, the majority of which are against parking.
http://www.auda.org.au/reviews/monetisation-2006/
http://www.auda.org.au/pdf/auda-domainmon-public.pdf
The close and substantial connection rule is fairly new, prior to this you had to own the business name or you could not register a domain, basically each business could only have 1 domain.
All of the really good generic names were reserved and sold at an auction by AUDA, because of the history behind the AU name space it has a unique following of supporters who like the fact its different from .com and applaud these policies.
The reason behind my domains being deleted was because of complaints, these AUDA supporters are a vocal group, much in the same way anti spam groups police the spam situation.
If you read their responses you will quickly understand the kind of people I am up against, and as you would imagine they out number the domainers.
I know several local domainers and have made them aware, but many will never know this is up for discussion. It is an unfair situation, AUDA supporters visit the site and know what is going on, domainers dont, and on a local scale domainers are outnumbered, however there are a lot of Australian domainers who only deal in .com currently (fabulous for one).
I hope this thread will reach some more Aussies or for you to pass it to your Aussie friends and business contacts.
As much as I do not want to encourage competition in the AU name space, it is either we open it up or it is completely closed off.
There is also nothing limiting a global response, anyone is entitled to send a response to AUDA on the matter and it would be published.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thanks
Wade