- Joined
- Sep 28, 2007
- Messages
- 453
- Reaction score
- 5
Here is part of a discussion on the sale of a domain name. I did not post the domain for sale, but was contacted by email first. I was called the next day and was asked a few questions. All the other communications have been by email.
Buyer wanted one domain name and a Sup TM.
I offered the buyer a list of identical domain names and a few other domains that are very close to the TM in my email. This list would increase the sale price. They acted as they did not have any intention to by any thing other then TM and the name in dot com
I agreed to a price for one domain extension and TM, I keep the rest and the response was:
I wonder if this email is a binding agreement, I was not notified that it had any legal effects before I entered the decision. Any how I felt I was tricked, the email communications is now a binding contract (the lawyer has me thinking this is part of a legal contract to sell) Now that it is suggest that our chat in emails has become something legal. I now find terms hidden in the forum of a question. Why would the lawyer ask me to give more then the one domain name they wanted. I had them all package for a higher price and they declined to buy them as a portfolio. See quote below:
I am working on the agreement now. For point of clarification / you are relinquishing right in the (removed name) mark and corresponding domain names.
I sent a notice that agreement is to much and I will not sell. They wanted all extensions for free or it seems to me, they would use and pay a lawyer to get them rather then pay a business man. The Lawyer seems to act as the email communications is a legally binding contract (written agreement) and then as I look over all postings, I see this line posed above. I have a thought this is some kind of notice and can be used in the courts. The TM description has a user interacting with a website. I think If I use the other domain names for a parked page displaying ads, I would not fall in to a TM volition. I lose in Court because of this: "you are relinquishing right in the (removed name) mark and corresponding domain names."
Have I been up to long and got paranoid?
Buyer wanted one domain name and a Sup TM.
I offered the buyer a list of identical domain names and a few other domains that are very close to the TM in my email. This list would increase the sale price. They acted as they did not have any intention to by any thing other then TM and the name in dot com
I agreed to a price for one domain extension and TM, I keep the rest and the response was:
Thank you for your email. This confirms our happy receipt of your acceptance below. I will prepare and forward a purchase and transfer agreement in the near term.
I wonder if this email is a binding agreement, I was not notified that it had any legal effects before I entered the decision. Any how I felt I was tricked, the email communications is now a binding contract (the lawyer has me thinking this is part of a legal contract to sell) Now that it is suggest that our chat in emails has become something legal. I now find terms hidden in the forum of a question. Why would the lawyer ask me to give more then the one domain name they wanted. I had them all package for a higher price and they declined to buy them as a portfolio. See quote below:
Thank you. I am working on the agreement now. For point of clarification, are you intending to include the list of domain names in your email earlier today, as you are relinquishing right in the (removed name) mark and corresponding domain names? If so, I would suggest we structure the agreement, for the purpose of payment to you, contingent on transfer of the (tm name.com) domain name only which would give us more time to complete the other transfers. That will get you the funds more quickly rather than waiting for all transfers to be completed.
I look forward to hearing from you on this inquiry.
I am working on the agreement now. For point of clarification / you are relinquishing right in the (removed name) mark and corresponding domain names.
I sent a notice that agreement is to much and I will not sell. They wanted all extensions for free or it seems to me, they would use and pay a lawyer to get them rather then pay a business man. The Lawyer seems to act as the email communications is a legally binding contract (written agreement) and then as I look over all postings, I see this line posed above. I have a thought this is some kind of notice and can be used in the courts. The TM description has a user interacting with a website. I think If I use the other domain names for a parked page displaying ads, I would not fall in to a TM volition. I lose in Court because of this: "you are relinquishing right in the (removed name) mark and corresponding domain names."
Have I been up to long and got paranoid?