Hi, Certified Newbie here, though have registered domains as an end user since 1995.
I've personally used, over the years, probably 20 different registrars for dotcoms, probably less, but it fees that many -- from networks solutions to valueweb to dotster to godaddy to 1and1 to website.in/answerable to hostmonster, snapnames, namejet, sedo, blah blah and many in between. It's always a mystery to me, no matter how many times people explain their process of expiration to redemption and when something goes back to registry for public availability to register a domain again.
Just when I thought I'd gotten it down at GoDaddy, there'd be some NEW "black box" variable that nobody could ever explain. Nobody has ever ever EVER been able to have been pinned down to give me exact unvarying methodology... but one long time veteran at GoDaddy did admit to me several years ago that registrar relationships and money play a role at ICANN regarding the sequencing of backorders and how they get fulfilled etc... and how even when something has been returned to registry, a GoDaddy can, under special considerations, grab it back, using "credits" or some mystery-meat term I can't remember.
Okay, that's my preamble.
Here's my reality.
I was going after this domain, via a backorder placed thru GoDaddy, under am assumption that the larger registrars do have some clout in that process -- if all other factors are equal in terms of when a backorder was placed. Sorry but i just have seen too much over the years to naively believe that some fairy godmother at ICANN ensures that the exact first backorder placed will FOR CERTAIN get the domain if it gets to that stage. Doesn't happen.
So, here is official ICANN registry for .coms: verisign; their WHOIS:
http://www.verisigninc.com/en_US/products-and-services/domain-name-services/whois/index.xhtml
The domain is:
simplemobileusa.com
as of 6:13am pacific, I get this:
Here's their WHOIS:
https://register.ca/en/whois.php == again, simplemobileusa.com
As of 6:15am pacific friday april 22:
But according to godaddy, as of 5am pacific, today april 22, the domain got either renewed finally in the 11th hour of redemption, OR someone else's backorder got executed first -- which is fine, I can live with that, if that's what happened.
Their backorder tracking showed for that domain the expiration date was now April 2012 -- while the various WHOIS servers, including the official registrar handling the domain still said 2011.
BUT WHY IS THAT THE CASE when the WHOIS server pages say
Thanks for any decoding the pros can give me. I'm fine with not winning someting. What I can't stand is conflicting information. Why does this industry have to have such constant cloaking? vs. above board and transparent?
I've personally used, over the years, probably 20 different registrars for dotcoms, probably less, but it fees that many -- from networks solutions to valueweb to dotster to godaddy to 1and1 to website.in/answerable to hostmonster, snapnames, namejet, sedo, blah blah and many in between. It's always a mystery to me, no matter how many times people explain their process of expiration to redemption and when something goes back to registry for public availability to register a domain again.
Just when I thought I'd gotten it down at GoDaddy, there'd be some NEW "black box" variable that nobody could ever explain. Nobody has ever ever EVER been able to have been pinned down to give me exact unvarying methodology... but one long time veteran at GoDaddy did admit to me several years ago that registrar relationships and money play a role at ICANN regarding the sequencing of backorders and how they get fulfilled etc... and how even when something has been returned to registry, a GoDaddy can, under special considerations, grab it back, using "credits" or some mystery-meat term I can't remember.
Okay, that's my preamble.
Here's my reality.
I was going after this domain, via a backorder placed thru GoDaddy, under am assumption that the larger registrars do have some clout in that process -- if all other factors are equal in terms of when a backorder was placed. Sorry but i just have seen too much over the years to naively believe that some fairy godmother at ICANN ensures that the exact first backorder placed will FOR CERTAIN get the domain if it gets to that stage. Doesn't happen.
So, here is official ICANN registry for .coms: verisign; their WHOIS:
http://www.verisigninc.com/en_US/products-and-services/domain-name-services/whois/index.xhtml
The domain is:
simplemobileusa.com
as of 6:13am pacific, I get this:
The registrar of record, at least for this last year, was/is register.ca :Domain Name: SIMPLEMOBILEUSA.COM
Registrar: REGISTER.CA INC.
Whois Server: whois.register.ca
Referral URL: http://www.register.ca
Name Server: NS1.BRINKSTER.COM
Name Server: NS2.BRINKSTER.COM
Status: redemptionPeriod
Updated Date: 21-apr-2011
Creation Date: 12-mar-2010
Expiration Date: 12-mar-2011
>>> Last update of whois database: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:12:08 UTC <<<
Here's their WHOIS:
https://register.ca/en/whois.php == again, simplemobileusa.com
As of 6:15am pacific friday april 22:
I wasn't familiar with the Brinkster name servers, so i did THAT lookup at verisign: It gave me this:Whois Server Version 2.0
Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered
with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
for detailed information.
Domain Name: SIMPLEMOBILEUSA.COM
Registrar: REGISTER.CA INC.
Whois Server: whois.register.ca
Referral URL: http://www.register.ca
Name Server: NS1.BRINKSTER.COM
Name Server: NS2.BRINKSTER.COM
Status: redemptionPeriod
Updated Date: 21-apr-2011
Creation Date: 12-mar-2010
Expiration Date: 12-mar-2011
>>> Last update of whois database: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:14:40 UTC <<<
Is Brinkster affiliated with Dotster? Does this perhaps tell me that the new registrant -- who perhaps won the backorder of this domain, is a Dotster customer? I am clueless.Server Name: NS1.BRINKSTER.COM
IP Address: 65.182.99.55
Registrar: DOTSTER, INC.
Whois Server: whois.dotster.com
Referral URL: http://www.dotster.com
>>> Last update of whois database: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:10:36 UTC <<<
But according to godaddy, as of 5am pacific, today april 22, the domain got either renewed finally in the 11th hour of redemption, OR someone else's backorder got executed first -- which is fine, I can live with that, if that's what happened.
Their backorder tracking showed for that domain the expiration date was now April 2012 -- while the various WHOIS servers, including the official registrar handling the domain still said 2011.
GoDaddy tells me the feed they get to their backorder tracking is more accurate and more current than what populates on the WHOIS server info. And indeed those various WHOIS data pages will say "may take 48 hours to update new transactions" .<table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="right"><nobr>Monitoring Status:</nobr> </td> <td width="5">
</td><td valign="top" align="left"> Active </td> </tr> <!-- Backorder Status --> <tr> <td valign="top" align="right"> <nobr>Backorder Status:</nobr> </td> <td width="5">
</td><td valign="top" align="left"> Active </td> </tr> <!-- Monitor/Backorder Type --> <tr> <td valign="top" align="right"> <nobr>Type:</nobr> </td> <td width="5">
</td><td valign="top" align="left"> Public Backorder (Update Privacy) </td> </tr> <!-- Last Checked On --> <tr> <td valign="top" align="right"> <nobr>Last Checked On:</nobr> </td> <td width="5">
</td><td valign="top" align="left"> 4/21/2011 1:15 PM </td> </tr> <!-- Monitor Whois Current Registrar --> <tr> <td valign="top" align="right"> <nobr>Current Registrar:</nobr> </td> <td width="5">
</td><td valign="top" align="left"> REGISTER.CA INC. </td> </tr> <!-- Monitor Whois Expires On --> <tr> <td valign="top" align="right"> <nobr>Expires On:</nobr> </td> <td width="5">
</td><td valign="top" align="left"> 12-mar-2012 </td> </tr> <!-- Monitor Whois Registry Status --> <tr> <td valign="top" align="right"> <nobr>Registry Status:</nobr> </td> <td width="5">
</td><td valign="top" align="left"> clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited
</td> </tr> <!-- Monitor Whois Nameservers --> <tr> <td valign="top" align="right"> <nobr>Nameservers:</nobr> </td> <td width="5">
</td><td valign="top" align="left"> RENEW.REGISTER.CA
RENEWNOW.REGISTER.CA</td></tr></tbody></table>
BUT WHY IS THAT THE CASE when the WHOIS server pages say
What exactly does that mean? Is it meaning-LESS?>>> Last update of whois database: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:10:36 UTC <<<
Thanks for any decoding the pros can give me. I'm fine with not winning someting. What I can't stand is conflicting information. Why does this industry have to have such constant cloaking? vs. above board and transparent?
Last edited: