Am I right in thinking that the way in which the 'Expired Names' are detected is their lack of 'nameservers'? In a previous thread I expressed my confusion due to the fact that I was consistently seeing names on the expired lists that had plenty of time left before they expire (according to the Whois) ~ the one thing that these names have in common is the fact that they have no 'nameservers'; and the penny dropped! Would a name be falsely detected as on-hold if it had no 'nameservers' for some reason?
Cheers,
Syd.
Cheers,
Syd.