Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every DNForum feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!

Finally the verdict is out on .xxx

Status
Not open for further replies.

jdk

DNF Addict
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2004
Messages
6,350
Reaction score
24
I thought this was shut down a long long time ago? :confused:
 

carlton

Internet Real Estate
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2004
Messages
931
Reaction score
0
I haven't been following this issue but it occurs to me that forcing porn to the .xxx would offer certain filtering advantages (which are needed). Although, this would be pointless unless similar legislation also prohibited (fined) adult material in the .com space. You'd have to drive all porn from .com to the .xxx domain. This would be difficult to enforce, maybe impossible.
 

Ian

DNF Exclusive
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2006
Messages
1,616
Reaction score
5
passing a .xxx extension to adult rated websites would have had an impact (sensoring) but since the bid was rejected we'll wait for another time. But i still don't see why they approved of a .tel extension for contact informmation management yet rejected .xxx. The ruling is ridiculous in my opinion and calls for the need for ICANN to become an independent body not under the US Federal direction! Perhaps the UN or other overaching body would do the job better?
 

brian1234

Level 6
Legacy Gold Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
689
Reaction score
23
Abraham said:
The ruling is ridiculous in my opinion and calls for the need for ICANN to become an independent body not under the US Federal direction! Perhaps the UN or other overaching body would do the job better?

Yes, it is ridiculous and I think it is very clear
that the 'decision' had little to do with the
merits (or not) of the .xxx extension...

Regrettably, money and power influences
EVERY decision of this type and I don't think
that the UN would, necessarily, do a 'better'
job.

This was not an ext'n I would have gone for,
but you can't help feeling for the guy who lost
a fortune in sponsoring it! (maybe he should've
'greased a few palms' beforehand?).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 1) View details

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members Online

Premium Members

Upcoming events

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators

Top Bottom