Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every DNForum feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!

You must be a member of DNForum for a minimum of 30 days and have contributed to the community prior to being allowed to post an offer or create a new discussion of an affiliate program. This notice will disappear when your account is eligible.

You may also contact support if you feel you are receiving this message in error.

Site Direct helps you monetize your domain portfolios with ease

Reply to thread

Message

So much cool and exciting stuff happening in AI but truth be told, most folks fail to realize that right now, "boring" works best. And that's articles.

Can more than article writing be done with genAI?

Sure.

But in almost all cases, that particular technology is not yet production-ready. Simply put, it doesn't scale.

In contrast, we now have gigantic websites that are closing in on Investopedia in terms of article numbers (for reference, there are roughly 35,000 articles on Investopedia)... they paid low $xx,xxx,xxx for that content, whereas we get it done not ten times cheaper or a hundred times cheaper but downright a thousand times cheaper.

Are Investopedia's articles better than ours? Yes, but let me put it this way, there's not even twice as good. Thus, you pay one thousand times less for something that's maybe 40% "worse". It just plain scales.

Anyway, enough ranting, time to get back to business through our usual 30-50% discounts that can be accessed by clicking HERE.

Let's crush this!

<blockquote data-quote="AndreiPolgar.com" data-source="post: 2391997" data-attributes="member: 102602">So much cool and exciting stuff happening in AI but truth be told, most folks fail to realize that right now, &quot;boring&quot; works best. And that's articles.Can more than article writing be done with genAI?Sure.But in almost all cases, that particular technology is not yet production-ready. Simply put, it doesn't scale.In contrast, we now have gigantic websites that are closing in on Investopedia in terms of article numbers (for reference, there are roughly 35,000 articles on Investopedia)... they paid low $xx,xxx,xxx for that content, whereas we get it done not ten times cheaper or a hundred times cheaper but downright a thousand times cheaper.Are Investopedia's articles better than ours? Yes, but let me put it this way, there's not even twice as good. Thus, you pay one thousand times less for something that's maybe 40% &quot;worse&quot;. It just plain scales.Anyway, enough ranting, time to get back to business through our usual 30-50% discounts that can be accessed by clicking <a href="https://giganticwebsites.com/dnforum.php" target="_blank">HERE</a>.Let's crush this!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AndreiPolgar.com, post: 2391997, member: 102602"] So much cool and exciting stuff happening in AI but truth be told, most folks fail to realize that right now, "boring" works best. And that's articles. Can more than article writing be done with genAI? Sure. But in almost all cases, that particular technology is not yet production-ready. Simply put, it doesn't scale. In contrast, we now have gigantic websites that are closing in on Investopedia in terms of article numbers (for reference, there are roughly 35,000 articles on Investopedia)... they paid low $xx,xxx,xxx for that content, whereas we get it done not ten times cheaper or a hundred times cheaper but downright a thousand times cheaper. Are Investopedia's articles better than ours? Yes, but let me put it this way, there's not even twice as good. Thus, you pay one thousand times less for something that's maybe 40% "worse". It just plain scales. Anyway, enough ranting, time to get back to business through our usual 30-50% discounts that can be accessed by clicking [url=https://giganticwebsites.com/dnforum.php]HERE[/url]. Let's crush this! [/QUOTE]

Verification