Global Name Identities Are On Fire

[mole]

Here's a great link on naming

http://www.maconareaonline.com/news.asp?id=4504

 

[darrenl]

Great article that is.

 

[Digital Address]

Very good article. Thanks.

 

[tassos]

http://www.metrostate.com/library/stories/01/aug/ChicagoTribuneAug13.shtml

 

[Cash Is King]

Excellent information. Very well written. Thanks for posting DNMole.

 

[Cash Is King]

Tassos -- .com is the bomb.

 

[Biggie]

nice reading!

Thanks

 

[bidawinner]

Yawn..and yuck.. the guy dosent have a clue.. here is one of his quotes ..

"OWNERSHIP CRISIS: If you don't own a trademark or you don't own a solid domain name and sometimes neither, this is the most ridiculous situation to be in. All your money is being wasted to promote your competition. e.g. snowball.com, living.com dead, thirsty.com dead, go.com dead; eve.com dead, ONYX, eLink, Rational."
http://www.abcnamebank.com/rules.htm


Come on you guys are smarter than to fall for this nonsense..

the BOTTOM line is his business is BRANDING.. shit..dont go buy GO.COM .. instead pay for one of his seminars :laugh:

Or instead just hire him..

Javed has helped Telus, Celestica, Intrigna, Intria CIBC, Pollara and Vincor find new identities. And it's no cinch as his all-in fee of between $20,000 and $200,000 attests. It's all-in because for the money he guarantees to deliver an original, trademarkable, domain registrable, globally acceptable and appropriate corporate name. It's no cinch because, as Accenture found out, "98 per cent of the words in a typical English dictionary have already been registered as dot-com domains” and in today's world a corporate name without domain rights is a non-starter. An average of more than 80,000 domain names are registered every day.


like I said Yawn...

 

[seeker]

I guess I am in the minority that found the man's article complitely useless...