Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every DNForum feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!

google Fight for domain names escalates - TheNewsTribune.com (subscription)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bill Roy

Level 8
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2005
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
35
The 'reasons' given by these companies really annoy me, statements such as 'sell counterfeit goods' is a total sham on their part. They just do not want anybody else to have a name that is even similar to theirs, even if that company has been trading longer than they have! The bottom line is that they want the law to make the internet a haven ofr their abuse of size and power, anybody who steps on their toes should be crushed by the weight of the law. And who is to decide when a name is 'similar' to one of theirs? Is there going to be a carefully worked out strategm that produces an algorithm that says domain 'xxuwyzzquto.com' breaches the law but 'xxuwyzzqutp.com' does not?

Strange isn't it that the press love bashing domainers as 'cybersquatters' but at the same time says nothing about the loss of rights of the individual to register a domain (and I mean worldwide). It is also interesting that this organization is targeting 'national' law makers in the US and not ICANN, the international body responsible.

My tip to them is: Work at making TM law sensible and workable and forget your bully boy tactics.
 

Simsi

DNF Member
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
The key is branding. If you'd spent thousands or millions of $$ to build up a brand and someone was trying to take advantage of that and grab traffic or profit from it, you'd be a bit miffed too I suspect.

Personally I can understand it, but it's a different story if the "squatter" isn't trying to profit from the brand, dupe visitors or attract traffic that was otherwise intended for it. Or worse still, if they had the domain name before the brand was TM'ed. That's just tough luck on the brand owner and they should have done their homework.
 

DavidAusman

David Ausman
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
May 15, 2005
Messages
682
Reaction score
0
Yahoo joins the crowd, but then they serve ads to typo domains ;)
 

Bill Roy

Level 8
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2005
Messages
2,337
Reaction score
35
Simsi, I agree with you. It is just the stupid reasons they give to try and get public sympathy. A bit like a thief stealing goods from your home and when questioned saying 'well I did it for the owners benefit, they do not have to insure them anymore'! Pathetic excuses which just show what little respect these companies have for the mentality of the average Joe in the street.

TM law needs a major overhaul, unfortunately it does not seem to be on the cards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 1) View details

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members Online

Premium Members

Upcoming events

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators

Top Bottom