- Joined
- Apr 6, 2004
- Messages
- 274
- Reaction score
- 0
"GOOGLE'S PHILANTRHOPY TAKES DIFFERENT TACK: FOR-PROFIT... MORE... Founders of GOOGLE have set up philanthropy, giving it seed money of $1 billion and a mandate to tackle poverty, global warming, NYT and others will report on Thursday. But unlike most charities, this one will be for-profit, allowing it to fund startup companies, form partnerships with venture capitalists, and even lobby Congress... Developing..." - from drudgereport.com
What do you think of this?
I totally agree with the idea. I don't understand why people, like Warren Buffet for example, give billions to charity to spend when they could set up a for-profit business or investment fund and spin a large percentage of the profits off to charity forever. Buffet even put a time limit on his donation to make sure it would be spent quickly. This makes no sense to me, especially coming from apparently the smartest business person in the world. Am I wrong? Don't you think charities instead of taking several billion dollars up front, which they'd probably spend immediately, wouldn't they rather collect a billion dollars a year for the forseeable future?
What do you think of this?
I totally agree with the idea. I don't understand why people, like Warren Buffet for example, give billions to charity to spend when they could set up a for-profit business or investment fund and spin a large percentage of the profits off to charity forever. Buffet even put a time limit on his donation to make sure it would be spent quickly. This makes no sense to me, especially coming from apparently the smartest business person in the world. Am I wrong? Don't you think charities instead of taking several billion dollars up front, which they'd probably spend immediately, wouldn't they rather collect a billion dollars a year for the forseeable future?