help needed / thx

[tassos]

" Dear Tassos

As you may be aware, in November 2001, the United States Department of
Commerce ("DOC") selected NeuStar, Inc. ("NeuStar") to be the
Administrator of the .US top-level domain ("usTLD"), the official top-level
domain for the United States of America. As Administrator of the usTLD,
NeuStar has agreed to perform random "spot checks" on registrations in
the usTLD to endure that they comply with the usTLD Nexus Requirements
which can be found at
http://www.neustar.us/policies/docs...equirements.pdf
("Nexus Requirements").


Our records indicate that you are the registrant of the domain name
******.KIDS.US


On October 2, 2003, this domain name was selected of Nexus revalidation
and confirmation. According to the information you provided with your
registration of these Domain Names, you indicated that you qualify
under:


Category 3 - You are a "foreign entity organization that has a bona
fide presence in the United States of America or any of its possessions
or territories."


As part of our verification process, we ask that you provide to us by
no later than thirty (30) days after the date set forth above, a written
response describing how you qualify under the above Nexus category.

In some instances, we may request additional documentary evidence from
you to demonstrate that you meet the Nexus requirements.

You should be aware that if you either (i) do not respond within the
thirty(30) days, or (ii) are unable to adequately explain or demonstrate
through documentary evidence that you meet any of the Nexus
Requirements, NeuStar may issue a finding that your entity or organization has
failed to meet the Nexus Requirements. Upon such a finding, you will then
be given a total of thirty (30) days to cure the US Nexus deficiency.
If you are able to demonstrate within thirty (30) days that your entity
or organization has remedied such deficiency, you will be allowed to
keep the domain name. If, however, you either (i) do not respond within
the thirty (30) days of such a finding of noncompliance, or (ii) are
unable to proffer evidence demonstration compliance with the Nexus
Requirements, the domain name registration will be deleted from the registry
database without refund, and the domain name will be placed into the
list of available domain names.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Please let us know if
you have any questions.


Kind Regards
.US Customer Support
___________________________________________
NeuStar
.US America's Internet Address

Email: [email protected]
Address: Loudoun Tech Center
46000 Center Oak Plaza
Sterling, VA 20166 USA
Web Site: www.neustar.us
___________________________________________

"

 

[namedropper]

What kind of help are you looking for?

Not that I think you can be helped in this situation, but might as well ask.

 

[tassos]

an opinion what to do? can a lawyer be the representative for me ?

"Category 3 - You are a "foreign entity organization that has a bona
fide presence in the United States of America or any of its possessions
or territories."

or , if i transfer it to anothers persons account that leaves in us , is ok?

 

[jberryhill]

Tassos,

When you registered the domain name, you asserted that you satisfied the US nexus requirements for the .us TLD. Simply provide them with evidence supporting the assertion you made at that time.

If you do not satisfy the US nexus requirements in accordance with your registration contract, then do nothing and they will delete the registration.

If your question is "I lied in order to get a .us domain name, and now I need someone to help me perpetuate that lie", then, ummm, good luck.

 

[EM @MAJ.com]

Originally posted by jberryhill
Tassos,

When you registered the domain name, you asserted that you satisfied the US nexus requirements for the .us TLD. Simply provide them with evidence supporting the assertion you made at that time.

If you do not satisfy the US nexus requirements in accordance with your registration contract, then do nothing and they will delete the registration.

If your question is "I lied in order to get a .us domain name, and now I need someone to help me perpetuate that lie", then, ummm, good luck.

That was a direct response.

Cheers,
Em (thewatcher)

 

[tassos]

Originally posted by jberryhill
Tassos,

When you registered the domain name, you asserted that you satisfied the US nexus requirements for the .us TLD.
If your question is "I lied in order to get a .us domain name, and now I need someone to help me perpetuate that lie", then, ummm, good luck.

John thats not an answer from a lawyer that wants to help,
thats an asnwer from a lawyer from Newstar.
When another member was reg/ging dolphins.com or billgates.com his lawyer wouldn t say " you are a lier " .
His lawyer went to court and won the case for dolphins.com........(don t tell me that he regged the domain for a SEA portal about dolphins...and jets.com for airplanes..)

i didnt harm anyone , and yes i lied because i didn t search for a representative in USA from the first moment( about a month ago ) , but i m asking a way to make it legally now..
.not to stay with a ...lie...
I have the right to ask a lawyers help (even a killer has..) and the lawyer to help me , not tell me you are lier ..good luck with yourself...

i don t care for your ethics opinion , i asked for a lawyer not a priest...

and i didn t say for free.

now..
is there any real lawyer who wants a client in this forum?
thank you
Tassos Tsiliyannis

 

[seeker]

I'll try to get you in touch with one.
He represented me with a case a while back. Not the same as yours, but I am sure he can help.

But remember that like in every other field, there are helpful people, and 'not-so-helpful' people (to put it in a nice way).

and don't judge them... Sometimes the ego just doesnt know what its doing...

 

[tassos]

Originally posted by seeker
I'll try to get you in touch with one.
He represented me with a case a while back. Not the same as yours, but I am sure he can help.

But remember that like in every other field, there are helpful people, and 'not-so-helpful' people (to put it in a nice way).

and don't judge them... Sometimes the ego just doesnt know what its doing...

Thank you
i knew i could find people to help in this forum..lol
i don t judge people, i judge behaviour..from an old member to another old member..( i think i gave my exams in this forum long ago..)

 

[jberryhill]

Lawyers can also provide all sorts of advance advice to a client concerning the legal implications of a proposed course of action. What they cannot do is to become co-conspirators.

"When another member was reg/ging dolphins.com or billgates.com his lawyer wouldn t say..."

I am not your lawyer. The first thing I advise my clients to do is NOT to post information pertaining to their disputes on a public forum.

Do you seriously think for one minute that DNForum is some kind of "secret place" that people from Neustar can't read?

Do you seriously think there aren't troublemakers here who haven't already emailed your request to Neustar?

I didn't say you harmed anyone, except yourself. What you appear to have done is to have made a PUBLIC statement that you obtained a domain name by a fraudulent act, and you have solicited the assistance of a lawyer in perpetuating a fraudulent act.

Now, if you think about that long enough, you'll realize there is some extremely helpful information to be had there.

 

[seeker]

John,
If I may add my point of view here.
What you say, the paradigm you give is indeed very logical and with reason.
However, I believe Tassos was asking what he can do to make the situation 'now legal'. It seems to me he is asking for assistance in fixing this problem, while possibly still retaining ownership of the domain, perhaps through an indirect and legal method. Now we all know these methods exist, and since they are ultimately legal, they are here to serve a purpose.
Be it that the purpose might be extra security, better control, or whatever, but If a person is asking for help on how to make a status of a situation legal, and if possible (as it is in this case) to keep some sort of control of the domain, then I am afraid all you said above, however great sounding as it is, and clear as it may be, is simply not applicable.

Thanks.

 

[tassos]

Originally posted by jberryhill
1)Lawyers can also provide all sorts of advance advice to a client concerning the legal implications of a proposed course of action. What they cannot do is to become co-conspirators.

2)"When another member was reg/ging dolphins.com or billgates.com his lawyer wouldn t say..."

3)I am not your lawyer. The first thing I advise my clients to do is NOT to post information pertaining to their disputes on a public forum.

4)Do you seriously think for one minute that DNForum is some 7)kind of "secret place" that people from Neustar can't read?

5)Do you seriously think there aren't troublemakers here who haven't already emailed your request to Neustar?

6)I didn't say you harmed anyone, except yourself. What you appear to have done is to have made a PUBLIC statement that you obtained a domain name by a fraudulent act, and you have solicited the assistance of a lawyer in perpetuating a fraudulent act.

Now, if you think about that long enough, you'll realize there is some extremely helpful information to be had there.

John ,
corect me if i m wrong,
1)i don t need your advice for the implications,i know them.Worst senario is them to take the domain from me.I need advice to make it legal ( co-conspirators..to something legal?!! there's not such thing)If i m wrong , as a helpfull member you could already have adviced me for worst things that could happen to me.
2)his lawyer wouldn t say : "good luck by yourself " , and that's a fact
3)my case is not a "dispute" and we all agree with that, me also.Newstar is right..at least for the moment till i make it legal.
4) i don t have to hide anything , cause i didn t do anything against the "meaning" of law or rules.The meaning to have a representative is to have someone responsible for the US courts if there is an elegal use of the domain. I don t use it for anything , its just in enoms webpage, and i didn t plan to make anything elegal.I was planning to develop it ,after i had the time to look for a representative.If that was also elegal , i don t mind if they take the domain from me..
5) " troublemakers "...If there are people that protect the internet users from people making elegal actions, i m glad that there are troublemakers..i want to earn money from legal biz
6) i need a help from an attorney to make it legal, if there is no way to do that, i ll be glad to tell them i 'm sorry for my delay of auctions and give the domain back

The "extremely helpful information " of course is : DON T TALK ABOUT IT !
as a person in my life i never tried to hide myself from anything cause i never had the perpose to harm anyone or to make something elegal, i put ethics infront of my acts, and thats my personal decision , no matter if thats not the right way for a lawyer's opinion

Tassos

 

[jberryhill]

"as a person in my life i never tried to hide myself from anything cause i never had the perpose to harm anyone or to make something elegal,"

The reason why it is not a good idea to post specific facts in public when you have a legal problem has absolutely nothing to do with whether you did or did not do anything wrong. The sad truth is that people often say things in an inaccurate way, or using terms that have legal significance, which can be used against them. This can happen completely by accident. And while I appreciate the fact that your English is much better than my Greek would ever be, it is more likely that one is going to say something inadvertently harmful if English is not one's first language.

"i put ethics infront of my acts, and thats my personal decision , no matter if thats not the right way for a lawyer's opinion"

Then don't ask for a lawyers opinion. Three posts up you say "yes i lied". Okay, so you are an ethical liar.

I guess I should have made it clearer that I don' t, just off the cuff and without going over the Neustar agreements carefully, believe that there is a good way to "undo" the fact of the improper original registration.

Yes, you might be able to prevent Neustar from deleting the name by getting some straw party in the US to pose as the owner. But it could just as well turn out that if there is ever any future problem or dispute concerning the domain name, and the archived Neustar data is examined more closely, then it may in fact cause a larger problem for both you and whomever you find is willing to take your money to tell you they will "fix" it.

Yes, you will surely have no problem finding a lawyer who will take your money and promise you that he can solve all of your problems. There are lawyers who will, for a price, tell you whatever you want to hear. I'm sorry to be the one to tell you something you don't want to hear for free. I will avoid commenting on your posts in the future.

 

[tassos]

i apriciate the fact that you tried to protect me, and i m sorry if i was offensive .

 

[jberryhill]

No problem. I'm offensive on a regular basis.

I'm just jealous because I can't for the life of me figure out how you won that much on the roulette game.

 

[tassos]

i could tell you, but only in PM - its a trick

 

[jberryhill]

Geez... you cheat at games, too?

:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D

 

[tassos]

i didn t say i cheat...i use a method...lol

 

[tassos]

Originally posted by jberryhill
No problem. I'm offensive on a regular basis.

I'm just jealous because I can't for the life of me figure out how you won that much on the roulette game.

ok , i ll tell it how..


1st) i bet all the money in one number
if i win its about 17,500 $
if i loose i play new game with the same number, and again and again till i win
normaly it takes about 10 games bidding in the same number
2) i play all the 17,500 $ to red -black and if i m lucky i double them = 35,000 $
you can see from the scores that the other players used the same method from their scores
3) i play all the money to 1/3 of the numbers, if i win it will be around 46,500 $
if it was areak casino i would have played around 20 times with 500 $ = 10,000 $ and i would have won 46,500 $...


so, i don t cheat its only a method that you can use since you can start a new game when you loose
of course it needs luck also, but i m lucky
if someone use this method and beat me ,i ll play again and after the 3nd step i ll play red-black again to go for 93,000 $

my secret is out,
but since you asked i had to tell....
Tassos

 

[tassos]

i know it looks easy now that i told you, but you could have tried to find how i did it ...
everything is about method, stragedy and sometimes luck..
(i was winner in greek schools chess tournament..lol )

 

[tassos]

it seems that someone used my method and won me...i ll go get my place again..