There is a domain meditating company named '' that provides the domain escrow service between the '' which is the domain seller and the '' which is the buyer.
The domain maditating company which will be called as the '' hereinafter received the payment to purchase the domain from the B and the A turned over the domain to ''
Under this circumstance, the '' received another offer to purchase a domain from a new domain purchaser named '' and in order to cancel the sale of the domain to B and requested the '' to return the domain under the condition that the '' will may the Penalty for canceling the escrow fee origined from the canceling the transaction.
But the '' didn' return the domain to '' ignoring his request and pushed the domain to '' and the '' sent the money by selling the domain to the ''
In this case, I would like to find out if there is any problem on the '' which is the domain meditating company.
In another words, is it assumed the domain which was pushed to the meditating company '' is completely pushed to the '' or since the domain is not completely handed over to the '' yet, ( since it is still in the pocessing of the meditating company '') the possession right is still in the '' and is the C would have to respond to the 'A'' request on returning the domain?
Kindly, advice us if there were any similar case like this previously and also wish to know about your opinions which is related with this. Your detailed response would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you. hmmm...
The domain maditating company which will be called as the '' hereinafter received the payment to purchase the domain from the B and the A turned over the domain to ''
Under this circumstance, the '' received another offer to purchase a domain from a new domain purchaser named '' and in order to cancel the sale of the domain to B and requested the '' to return the domain under the condition that the '' will may the Penalty for canceling the escrow fee origined from the canceling the transaction.
But the '' didn' return the domain to '' ignoring his request and pushed the domain to '' and the '' sent the money by selling the domain to the ''
In this case, I would like to find out if there is any problem on the '' which is the domain meditating company.
In another words, is it assumed the domain which was pushed to the meditating company '' is completely pushed to the '' or since the domain is not completely handed over to the '' yet, ( since it is still in the pocessing of the meditating company '') the possession right is still in the '' and is the C would have to respond to the 'A'' request on returning the domain?
Kindly, advice us if there were any similar case like this previously and also wish to know about your opinions which is related with this. Your detailed response would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you. hmmm...