Images in signatures

[timechange.com]

Ahem. Are we testing this or it's a glitch? Either way, I decided to play it safe and not use if for blatant self-promotion until it's confirmed

 

[Sammy]

Nothing has changed in respect to images in sigs?!?!

 

[timechange.com]

Oh I must be dreaming then

 

[Sammy]

Maybe you bumped your head while bumping so many threads

 

[timechange.com]

Ouch baby, beee-have

 

[ShaunP]

Timechange .. I'm guessing the "website" will be adding promotional graphics/ads to signature lines, not individual membes doing it. It would fit in with the trend of the site. Just a guess of course.

Shaun

 

[timechange.com]

Anyway, back on-topic. I am not sure HTML tags were allowed before in the sig.

 

[timechange.com]

Originally posted by aactive
Timechange .. I'm guessing the "website" will be adding promotional graphics/ads to signature lines, not individual membes doing it. It would fit in with the trend of the site. Just a guess of course.

Shaun

Check my sig, see the image? That's what I am asking about BTW I put it there.

 

[Sammy]

Originally posted by timechange.com
Ouch baby, beee-have

:laugh:

Check my sig, see the image? That's what I am asking about BTW I put it there.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the no images was the rule rather than an option that we turned on and off

 

[timechange.com]

If it can't be turned off, it's allowed in my book

 

[timechange.com]

So it was a glitch

 

[Sammy]

Originally posted by timechange.com
So it was a glitch

:razz:

 

[Mr Webname]

Don't you just hate coming in when it's all over?

 

[Dingo]

Originally posted by Mr Webname
Don't you just hate coming in when it's all over?

I am sure ther are pills you can buy for that now Mr Web

 

[timechange.com]

ROFL