Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Domain Discussion
Domain Name Legal Issues
Important ICANN Comment Period to protect domain name legal rights to due process
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GeorgeK" data-source="post: 2264242" data-attributes="member: 357"><p>I was able to find the full text (in French) of the Moobitalk court decision, for those that might be interested:</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.legalis.net/jurisprudences/cour-dappel-de-paris-pole-5-ch-1-arret-du-8-novembre-2016/" target="_blank">https://www.legalis.net/jurisprudences/cour-dappel-de-paris-pole-5-ch-1-arret-du-8-novembre-2016/</a></p><p> </p><p>These court cases explain why IGOs (and other complainants) want to restrict the rights of domain name owners to go to court. They want to engage in "forum shopping" and know that UDRP panelists are very pro-complainant, unlike a real court where there is a more level playing field with true due process.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GeorgeK, post: 2264242, member: 357"] I was able to find the full text (in French) of the Moobitalk court decision, for those that might be interested: [URL]https://www.legalis.net/jurisprudences/cour-dappel-de-paris-pole-5-ch-1-arret-du-8-novembre-2016/[/URL] These court cases explain why IGOs (and other complainants) want to restrict the rights of domain name owners to go to court. They want to engage in "forum shopping" and know that UDRP panelists are very pro-complainant, unlike a real court where there is a more level playing field with true due process. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Domain Discussion
Domain Name Legal Issues
Important ICANN Comment Period to protect domain name legal rights to due process
Top
Bottom