- Joined
- Jan 24, 2004
- Messages
- 1,333
- Reaction score
- 12
Hi,
Internet Gambling: Kentucky Asks Court to Add US Defendants to Domain Seizure List
Written by Thomas Jensen
Wednesday, 16 December 2009
___
Dan
Internet Gambling: Kentucky Asks Court to Add US Defendants to Domain Seizure List
Written by Thomas Jensen
Wednesday, 16 December 2009
Lawyers representing the Commonwealth of Kentucky have asked the Franklin County Circuit court to add names of US citizens and companies to a lawsuit that seeks the forfeiture of 141 Internet domain names. Kentuckyâs effort to seize those Web site names, all related to Internet gambling, had been blocked by a January 2009 decision from the Kentucky Court of Appeals, in favor of iMEGA and other groups, including the Interactive Gaming Council and Sportsbook.com, representing the domain owners.
Though the new motion was made public by Kentuckyâs lawyers, none of the names of the US citizens or companies to be added to the seizure effort were revealed, despite requests by iMEGAâs attorneys.
A decision from the Kentucky Supreme Court is pending, after the stateâs lawyers challenged the Appeals Court verdict. Oral arguments from lawyers representing both sides of the dispute were heard by the Court in October of this year .
âIn the course of the litigation and the Commonwealthâs continuing investigation, the Commonwealth has learned the identity of certain entities and individuals involved in internet gambling operations, some of whom are U.S. citizens,â read the motion from Kentuckyâs lawyers. âThe Commonwealth asks for leave to amend its Complaint to add causes of action against these individuals and entities in personam.â
âItâs odd that Kentuckyâs lawyers would try something like this at such a late date, since weâre expecting a decision on this matter from the State Supreme Court any day now,â said iMEGA chairman Joe Brennan Jr. âIt seems like a âHail Mary passâ to me.â
âWeâre unaware of any âinvestigationsâ by the state attorney-general or law enforcement in Kentucky. The attorney-general himself asked to be dismissed from this suit last year. And there are no indictments or convictions that would enable Kentuckyâs lawyers to add the names of individual US citizens to their seizure action,â Brennan said. âIf anything, this last-minute gambit highlights our argument that Kentucky and the lower court provided no due process to the domain owners, since they seem bent on continuing down that path even now.â
The motion called for a hearing on Jan. 20th, 2010, in Franklin Circuit Court, before Judge Thomas Wingate. In Sept. 2008, Judge Wingate issued the original seizure orders for the 141 domain names during a secret court hearing with Kentuckyâs lawyers, one which the owners of the domain names were not informed of or given the opportunity to be represented by their own counsel. Source & Links
___
Dan