- Joined
- Nov 22, 2009
- Messages
- 1,434
- Reaction score
- 208
Let me give you an example.
Say I own a domain name which, in itself, is generic. We'll say Boss dot ca for argument's sake.
Hugo Boss, who uses the term quite heavily, would be a likely contender for one who would want to own the domain name.
However, it would be extremely unlikely that they could win the name by way of reverse hijacking, given the generic nature of the term.
Would I totally relinquish my rights in this regard, should I be the one to approach them to offer to sell them the name?
I'm thinking that might be the case, as it could be construed as an "intention to profit" from the mark of the would-be complainant. But this is a very tough call to make, in my opinion, when it comes to a term which is completely generic.
Any thoughts on the matter would be greatly appreciated!
Say I own a domain name which, in itself, is generic. We'll say Boss dot ca for argument's sake.
Hugo Boss, who uses the term quite heavily, would be a likely contender for one who would want to own the domain name.
However, it would be extremely unlikely that they could win the name by way of reverse hijacking, given the generic nature of the term.
Would I totally relinquish my rights in this regard, should I be the one to approach them to offer to sell them the name?
I'm thinking that might be the case, as it could be construed as an "intention to profit" from the mark of the would-be complainant. But this is a very tough call to make, in my opinion, when it comes to a term which is completely generic.
Any thoughts on the matter would be greatly appreciated!