- Joined
- Dec 26, 2007
- Messages
- 7,357
- Reaction score
- 223
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2008/dau2008-0021.html
Interesting WIPO. I guess someone felt they had more legal rights than they actually did?
66 names, too. I thought there was a limit or was there an extra fee added in with this?
Interesting WIPO. I guess someone felt they had more legal rights than they actually did?
66 names, too. I thought there was a limit or was there an extra fee added in with this?