I have recently read a thread pertaining to the charge of membership rates (simplified) here at DNForum. Both sides have made arguments regarding the necessity/lack of necessity.
I bring the following argument into the forum for discussion. My belief is that simple supply/demand properties will drive the survival/death of this proposition. Furthermore, the price level will be driven by the same forces.
Setting up this forum, maintaining it, along with fixed costs all add up to some aggregate cost. The question is, does advertising revenue cover these costs? Essentially, if you can factor in your own cost of labour into the cost equation then breaking even is not so bad, as you are technically paying yourself a wage - which you could earn elsewhere. But, I am sure Greg prefers to do what he enjoys for a living, and this forum probably provides some satisfaction.
If you truly believe that this forum provides value equal to or beyond the proposed fee then you will probably stay. If not, then the forum will have to decide what is worth more - losing you, or the cost of trying to get you back later.
Regardless, if the forum is losing money by operating as it is today then a fee is necessary. And the level of that fee will probably fluctuate based on sign-ups. If the fee is an attempt to profit from the forum then the same forces should apply. But we would expect less people to jump on board, as the membership fee will probably be higher than in the break-even scenario.
In the end, I think this is a good idea whose success/failure will be decided quite academically.
Best of luck with this. However, I am one who will not be paying.
My recommendation for the forum is to create a simple supply/demand curve by polling people (if you haven't already done so). Graphing prices versus acceptance of each price level should provide your demand curve. In the pool, include different price levels to vote on and let the market decide.
Your supply curve can be simple as well. What price will you supply services based on some number of people? If you can afford to supply services at $10/person based on 500 members then graph that point, etc..
And, as we all know,...the point at which they cross is equillibrium.
This may save you a lot of headaches down the road by having to reacquire a disgruntled past member - at an additional cost.
Just an idea that can be done with a simple poll.
I bring the following argument into the forum for discussion. My belief is that simple supply/demand properties will drive the survival/death of this proposition. Furthermore, the price level will be driven by the same forces.
Setting up this forum, maintaining it, along with fixed costs all add up to some aggregate cost. The question is, does advertising revenue cover these costs? Essentially, if you can factor in your own cost of labour into the cost equation then breaking even is not so bad, as you are technically paying yourself a wage - which you could earn elsewhere. But, I am sure Greg prefers to do what he enjoys for a living, and this forum probably provides some satisfaction.
If you truly believe that this forum provides value equal to or beyond the proposed fee then you will probably stay. If not, then the forum will have to decide what is worth more - losing you, or the cost of trying to get you back later.
Regardless, if the forum is losing money by operating as it is today then a fee is necessary. And the level of that fee will probably fluctuate based on sign-ups. If the fee is an attempt to profit from the forum then the same forces should apply. But we would expect less people to jump on board, as the membership fee will probably be higher than in the break-even scenario.
In the end, I think this is a good idea whose success/failure will be decided quite academically.
Best of luck with this. However, I am one who will not be paying.
My recommendation for the forum is to create a simple supply/demand curve by polling people (if you haven't already done so). Graphing prices versus acceptance of each price level should provide your demand curve. In the pool, include different price levels to vote on and let the market decide.
Your supply curve can be simple as well. What price will you supply services based on some number of people? If you can afford to supply services at $10/person based on 500 members then graph that point, etc..
And, as we all know,...the point at which they cross is equillibrium.
This may save you a lot of headaches down the road by having to reacquire a disgruntled past member - at an additional cost.
Just an idea that can be done with a simple poll.