- Joined
- Nov 1, 2006
- Messages
- 553
- Reaction score
- 13
I would suggest posting any question you have in the other thread that was already started and letting Pool.com respond to them
Which thread are you talking about?.
I would suggest posting any question you have in the other thread that was already started and letting Pool.com respond to them
Thanks for posting that Rebel.com, I would have posted it as well. There are always two sides to the story and indeed the most relevent in this one is that neither I (Richard Schreier) nor Pool.com have ownership in Drake Ventures. There are often times when I wished I were a domain tycoon but alas I am not... :-(
And FYI mobiledesigner, we did not pick up any MOBI domains either. Unfortunately, we sometimes get stuck with domains that customers order and then when we get them they refuse to pay for them or they turn out to be fraudsters. We can't return them to the registry because all this usually happens after the add grace period, like within six months when chargebacks can occur. So we end up holding them for a year.
If any one has questions or wnats clarificaiton to the allegations on Mr. Rueckers site I welceom all inquiries. [email protected]
"Under shady circumstances some camouflaged companies owned by tycoon 'Lucky Rich' Richard Schreier, CEO of dotasia-auctioneer pool.com, caught many top-domains in .asia-auctions"
http://www.dotasia-complot.org/
http://www.domainnews.com/en/general/dotasia-ceo-responds-to-allegations-of-foul-play.html
I believe he is saying there was no other valid sunrise application. The domains were not auctioned, they were registered during the sunrise period. Of course others would be intersted in a domain like porn.asia but they didn't submit to the sunrise application period with a valid application.
*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators