For Sale More news on SnapNames & WLS

[Domain]

Found this mentioned at ICANNWatch. It is getting interesting!

SnapNames responds to Names Council WLS Report
http://snapnames.com/downloads/072602Response.pdf

 

[GeorgeK]

It's their same ad nauseum and recycled arguments. See my rebuttal at:

http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc10/msg03002.html

and

http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc10/msg03004.html

Sincerely,

George

 

[mole]

Stop the WLS and help save the lifelihoods of people involved in the expired name industry !

 

[bigdave]

Originally posted by Domain
Found this mentioned at ICANNWatch. It is getting interesting!

SnapNames responds to Names Council WLS Report
http://snapnames.com/downloads/072602Response.pdf

Wow, that response is so full of b.s. that I can't even begin to deal with it.

Though I do enjoy the world class falsehood about how competition is "unaffected". Once WLS is in place, anybody who really wants a name must buy a WLS subscription on it. The WLS subscription will trump all other services, so how can any other service "compete"?

The arrogance of VeriSnap that they can add new services as they **** well please is astonishing. If ICANN lets them get away with that position, the Dept of Commerce should terminate its contract with ICANN and take legal action to revoke VGRS's contract.

BD

 

[DropWizard.com]

RE: Snap Names Response

The puppet speaks.

 

[Nic]

ha hah aha

 

[DropWizard.com]

ha hah aha

Gosh that sounds insincere