Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every DNForum feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!

NAF Issues Three Decisions on Internet Domain Name Disputes

Status
Not open for further replies.

companyone

DNF Regular
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
12
AGIPNEWS4428

23/5/2007 08:56 GMT
ag-IP-news
NAF Issues Three Decisions on Internet Domain Name Disputes

Special to ag-IP-news Agency

MINNEAPOLIS - The National Arbitration Forum (NAF) recently issued decisions on three separate domain name disputes filed by Disney, Jimmy Buffett and Angels Baseball.

"We continue to see a trend towards filing complaints under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), rather than lawsuits, for these Internet conflicts,” Internet Legal Counsel of the NAF Kristine Dorrain said.

"We're on the way to surpassing last year's record-breaking domain name filings," she added. In 2006, the NAF saw its largest filing year ever, marking a 21% increase over 2005.

The following three decisions were made in accordance with the UDRP of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) by independent and neutral arbitrators on the National Arbitration Forum's panel.

One of the world's largest entertainment corporations, Disney Enterprises Inc., submitted a complaint electronically on February 15, 2007. The NAF panel found that the domain name DisneyComics.com was being cybersquatted by Dayanand Kamble of India who used the website to offer advertising links and products, some related to Disney's trademarks.

The panel found that the domain name was confusingly similar to the DISNEY mark. In addition, the respondent used the website for commercial gain and therefore had no legitimate rights in it. Furthermore, DisneyComics.com was registered and being used in bad faith by the respondent who took advantage of the confusing similarity between the disputed domain name and Disney's famous mark. Because the complainant proved all three elements required of the ICANN Policy, the request to transfer DisneyComics.com to Disney Enterprises Inc. was granted on March 27, 2007.

On February 22, 2007, Margaritaville Enterprises LLC, controlled by popular singer Jimmy Buffett, submitted a complaint electronically with the NAF asserting legal rights to the domain names BuffettUniversity.com, JBuffett.com, JimmyBuffettUniversity.com and UniversityOfBuffett.com.

The panel concluded that the Jimmy Buffett-themed domain names were identical or confusingly similar to the registered trademark JIMMY BUFFETT. Furthermore, the respondent and registered owner Whapp Innovations Inc. was using the domain names to operate pay-per-click websites and thusly for commercial gain. It was clear to the panel that the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain names and had registered and used them in bad faith. On April 2, 2007, the panel found that the complainant had established all three elements required under the ICANN Policy and had defended successfully its trademark in domain name dispute resolution. The four domain names were ordered to be transferred to Jimmy Buffett.

On February 26, 2007, the Los Angeles Major League Baseball team, Angels Baseball, filed a complaint electronically with the NAF against Lee Dongyeon, the registered owner of Angels.com. The respondent, of Korea, requested the dispute be decided by a three-member panel.

The panel found that Angels.com was identical to the complainant's ANGELS trademark. However, it was found that the Respondent had registered the ANGELS mark in Korea without any opposition from the American baseball team. Because the respondent has trademark rights in the domain name, Angels Baseball failed to prove this element.

Finally, the panel found that the respondent may not have known of complainant and therefore did not register Angels.com in bad faith. Although the baseball team uses ANGELS as a trademark, it failed to prove two of three elements required under the ICANN policy to transfer a domain name. The panel denied the transfer of Angels.com to Angels Baseball on May 14, 2007.

The National Arbitration Forum, an industry leader in arbitration and mediation services for over 20 years, is an expert in the resolution of Internet-based disputes. Source
 

Gerry

Dances With Dogs
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2006
Messages
14,984
Reaction score
1,302
Just goes to show that careless and reckless regs can lead to some serious consequences.

The Angels.com decision I think is fair and just. Seems to be some decent people making some decent decisions.

The most startling part of all of this and something to ponder by all of us...

"We're on the way to surpassing last year's record-breaking domain name filings," she added. In 2006, the NAF saw its largest filing year ever, marking a 21% increase over 2005.
 

GAMEFINEST

PURE SAVAGE
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2006
Messages
3,584
Reaction score
0
Domain name filings are going up indeed, but how many are TM domains...
 

Simsi

DNF Member
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
The Angels one is interesting. IMO it shouldn't really have even needed a "dispute panel" to pass judgment I'd have thought. Its a perfectly legitimate dictionary word and the only thing that could have got the owner in trouble was if he was passing it off on,or monetising, the TM of the baseball team.

Anyway, more interesting is the statement "Because the respondent has trademark rights in the domain name..." indicating that the owner had somehow TM'ed Angels in Korea?

Can one TM a dictionary word that easily - two seperate people in two seperate countries have seemingly managed to do do?
 

Gerry

Dances With Dogs
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2006
Messages
14,984
Reaction score
1,302
Can one TM a dictionary word that easily - two seperate people in two seperate countries have seemingly managed to do do?
The USTPO will usually not issue a TM on a generic word. In other words, giving one exclusive rights above all others to use that one particular word. One word can have numerous TM's on it...TM is "trade mark". How you use that word as your branding and in your commerce activiities. The TM would be on how the word is used, as in branding, design, and logo. Several may have TM's on the same word at the same time...that is just one country.

The Angels (MLB) is TM in their merchandising which is all part of MLB. What the Korean TM is would be anyone's guess. This whole case was simply one person or entity wanting something someone else had simply because they thought they were entitled to it.

I own the Anaheim Angels baseball team, therefore angels dot com should be mine along with everything angels as in movies rights, dictionary usage, songs, and the other 79,500,000 google entries and the 229,391 items sold on Amazon.com with that word in it.

Interestingly .net and .org are owned by one owner, someone different from .com, and .info and .biz are each owned by someone else. So why not go after them?

But here is the real embarrassment.

Angels.us...that is owned by MLB, regged in 2002.
Domain Registration Date: Fri Apr 19 20:56:24 GMT 2002

Angels.com...
Domain Registration Date....: 2002-06-07 GMT

I live in the Amazon jungle so I'll go after that one also.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 1) View details

Who has watched this thread (Total: 2) View details

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members Online

Premium Members

Upcoming events

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators

Top Bottom