Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every DNForum feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!

Reply to thread

Message

Actually it's the only possible explanation for this story which comes to my mind , I really doubt that anybody from stuff will conact tm holder offering him/her to sell that domain - it's really impossible.

The only thing which is unclear for me is that TM Holder in UDPR notice had mentioned that he/she contacted with NJ or NS ( whatever ). As I know after receiving UDPR complaint registrar should put a lock on that domain at once ( but maybe they received original documents , but by that time auction was already over ? ) .

Whatever I hope that this problem will be resolved , and after reading again all this thread I have to tell that I really think that there is no reason to blame Namejet on this issue ( Though i really do not like them )

<blockquote data-quote="rentdn" data-source="post: 1554541" data-attributes="member: 10346">Actually it's the only possible explanation for this story which comes to my mind ,&nbsp; I really doubt that anybody from stuff will conact tm holder offering him/her to sell that domain - it's really impossible. The only thing which is unclear for me is that TM Holder in UDPR notice had mentioned that he/she contacted with NJ or NS ( whatever ). As I know after receiving UDPR complaint registrar should put a lock on that domain at once ( but maybe they received original documents , but by that time auction was already over ? ) .Whatever I hope that this problem will be resolved , and after reading again all this thread I have to tell that I really think that there is no reason to blame Namejet on this issue ( Though i really do not like them <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> )</blockquote>

[QUOTE="rentdn, post: 1554541, member: 10346"] Actually it's the only possible explanation for this story which comes to my mind , I really doubt that anybody from stuff will conact tm holder offering him/her to sell that domain - it's really impossible. The only thing which is unclear for me is that TM Holder in UDPR notice had mentioned that he/she contacted with NJ or NS ( whatever ). As I know after receiving UDPR complaint registrar should put a lock on that domain at once ( but maybe they received original documents , but by that time auction was already over ? ) . Whatever I hope that this problem will be resolved , and after reading again all this thread I have to tell that I really think that there is no reason to blame Namejet on this issue ( Though i really do not like them ;) ) [/QUOTE]

Verification