Hi Guys,
I have a vague understanding of how WIPO and URDP works, so I have some questions and an actual scenario for you guys.
I have with me a domain name of a popular music group, lets call them XGroupName, so I was able to recently pickup the dropped name of XGroupName.com. I plan on building a fansite based on the group with good intentions, good faith overall. Before the domain dropped, it was merely being used as a holding page with an image for an unrelated topic. The domain has a history, being registered as far back as June 2002 for a spanish portal site, whereas the musicians XGroupName only trademarked their name in September 2002.
So, should the event come where XGroupName sends me a C&D requesting me to end my fan site, what can I argue in defense, or if it were to go to WIPO?
-It was registered in good faith, with the intention of building a fan site to help promote XGroupName and keeping the domain from being wasted like it was before it dropped.
- Its currently being used in good faith to promote XGroupName and will not change
- XGroupName did not pursue to acquire the domain from previous owners (or at least to my knowledge did not succesfully acquire it)
- XGroupName had ample opportunity to pick up the domain as I did when it expired and for whatever reason chose not to or was not aware?
- XGroupName already owns their own website and domain under a different domain name
Would these arguements be accept or feasible under WIPO case review? Specifically, how do I prove that I have a right of ownership to the domain that outweighs their widely known copyright and trademark?
I look forward to discussion, all opinions welcome. Thanks!
I have a vague understanding of how WIPO and URDP works, so I have some questions and an actual scenario for you guys.
I have with me a domain name of a popular music group, lets call them XGroupName, so I was able to recently pickup the dropped name of XGroupName.com. I plan on building a fansite based on the group with good intentions, good faith overall. Before the domain dropped, it was merely being used as a holding page with an image for an unrelated topic. The domain has a history, being registered as far back as June 2002 for a spanish portal site, whereas the musicians XGroupName only trademarked their name in September 2002.
So, should the event come where XGroupName sends me a C&D requesting me to end my fan site, what can I argue in defense, or if it were to go to WIPO?
-It was registered in good faith, with the intention of building a fan site to help promote XGroupName and keeping the domain from being wasted like it was before it dropped.
- Its currently being used in good faith to promote XGroupName and will not change
- XGroupName did not pursue to acquire the domain from previous owners (or at least to my knowledge did not succesfully acquire it)
- XGroupName had ample opportunity to pick up the domain as I did when it expired and for whatever reason chose not to or was not aware?
- XGroupName already owns their own website and domain under a different domain name
Would these arguements be accept or feasible under WIPO case review? Specifically, how do I prove that I have a right of ownership to the domain that outweighs their widely known copyright and trademark?
I look forward to discussion, all opinions welcome. Thanks!