Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Other
The Watercooler
NFTs: I just don't understand
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mr-x" data-source="post: 2344541" data-attributes="member: 5381"><p>Possibly. Not a very green way of displaying art, on the other hand you don't have to worry about UV light, I guess.</p><p></p><p>Don't think it will ever compare to a real painting. Photographs can be art but a photograph of a masterpiece doesn't compare to seeing it in real life in a museum. They are breathtaking.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I do understand it. I used to cut pictures of classic art out of magazines and put them on the wall in nice frames. My friend, a photographer would have a shit-fit because I was "stealing a picture" of artwork in the public domain.</p><p></p><p>People have different values and will behave differently. It doesn't make what they do right, I"m just saying what I think.</p><p></p><p></p><p>That is my point. There is no difference between your electronic drawing and a copy, except the NFT. That will matter to some people but not most.</p><p></p><p>NFT's may help in copyright protection and prevent people from selling your artwork openly but not casually. No different than copy protection on CD or DVD.</p><p></p><p></p><p>LOL <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mr-x, post: 2344541, member: 5381"] Possibly. Not a very green way of displaying art, on the other hand you don't have to worry about UV light, I guess. Don't think it will ever compare to a real painting. Photographs can be art but a photograph of a masterpiece doesn't compare to seeing it in real life in a museum. They are breathtaking. I do understand it. I used to cut pictures of classic art out of magazines and put them on the wall in nice frames. My friend, a photographer would have a shit-fit because I was "stealing a picture" of artwork in the public domain. People have different values and will behave differently. It doesn't make what they do right, I"m just saying what I think. That is my point. There is no difference between your electronic drawing and a copy, except the NFT. That will matter to some people but not most. NFT's may help in copyright protection and prevent people from selling your artwork openly but not casually. No different than copy protection on CD or DVD. LOL :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other
The Watercooler
NFTs: I just don't understand
Top
Bottom