Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Domain Discussion
General Domain Name Discussion
nTLD Stats - Not looking good .
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jmcc" data-source="post: 2348160" data-attributes="member: 80388"><p>That was, ironically, the point at which Frank Schilling stopped thinking like a domainer and started thinking like a registry operator. However, it was poorly implemented and there should have been better terms for those who had registered domain names. </p><p></p><p>Higher regfees encourage renewals but only if they have been (roughly) at that level since the TLD was introduced. This is because people tend to value things that they have spent money on even when they are not particularly valuable. (The Sunk Cost fallacy.) There is also a golden handcuffs aspect to registries increasing the renewal fees on marginal TLDs. It targets brand protection registrations which are continually renewed but it damages the credibility of the TLD. Eventually people just drop their domain names in the TLD.</p><p></p><p>Regards...jmcc</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jmcc, post: 2348160, member: 80388"] That was, ironically, the point at which Frank Schilling stopped thinking like a domainer and started thinking like a registry operator. However, it was poorly implemented and there should have been better terms for those who had registered domain names. Higher regfees encourage renewals but only if they have been (roughly) at that level since the TLD was introduced. This is because people tend to value things that they have spent money on even when they are not particularly valuable. (The Sunk Cost fallacy.) There is also a golden handcuffs aspect to registries increasing the renewal fees on marginal TLDs. It targets brand protection registrations which are continually renewed but it damages the credibility of the TLD. Eventually people just drop their domain names in the TLD. Regards...jmcc [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Domain Discussion
General Domain Name Discussion
nTLD Stats - Not looking good .
Top
Bottom