<< Open Reply Response to Trafficz Denial >>

[domainsusi]

Here is part of an apparent robot message:

Unfortunately at this time we are unable to offer you a TrafficZ account. Our minimum requirements enable us to cater to the major players in the domain and traffic management segment and to provide the best possible service to all of our clients.

So here is my response and questions to the staff of Trafficz:

Well - what are your minimum requirements (to cater to the major players in the domain and traffic management segment) aside of having 100 domains?

I have attempted an application with you folks a couple of years ago and got another one of these obscure denials.

Why don't you all make it easier on people by posting your requirements up front instead of having us all jump through several hoops, disclosing our profile and email address for you all to harvest and possibly exploit, plus doing a lot of work just to apply.

.

 

[Lizzy]

Dear Domainsusi,

Thank you for bringing this to our attention. As stated on our website at http://trafficz.com/faqs.php and as was sent to you in our initial email, we currently require a minimum of 100 .com, .net or .org domain names. The application that was submitted did not meet these requirements, and more information was not provided upon second request. We then cancelled your application per your request.

We welcome you to reapply with our minimum requirements, we would be more than happy to expedite your application upon receipt. In the mean time, if you have any further questions, please feel free to email me at any time.

Best regards,
Lizzy Quiroga

 

[Namebrander]

trafficz suck

 

[BobDiGiTaL]

According to your iTrader rating, you've had more than 100 names.
Why don't you just list more than 84 names?

P.S. I feel ya on the "harvesting" issue.

 

[Sleepys]

I had the same thing happen to me on my initial application. You should check very carefully to make sure that you don't have any typos in the list of dsomains that you sent in your application, particularly mixed up extentions (like putting .com, when you actually own the .net). Their form response is so vague and really doesn't tell you what is wrong with your application at all, but it might just be that you made some typos and they think you are applying with less than you have. Also, if you apply with over 100 and are still rejected, try sending them the traffic stats that you are currently getting, if the portfolio already generates a lot of traffic, then I can't see why they would reject you. It may just be a matter of telling them how much traffic to expect rather than letting them try to figure it out themselves.
Those are my best suggestions.

 

[Dr Nump]

http://www.dnforum.com/showthread.php?t=240472

Even you submitted enough 100's .com , next reason will be we only play with "big player". Why dont try parked with better CPC and 2 times payout monthly ?
Feel free to PM for my ref link .

 

[ClickEarn]

Trafficz is only dealing with "Larger" accounts now. You may even get denied
if you have 100s' of domains that are of very low quality. I do not blame them
If I owned the system I would not want to manage thousands of accounts
that did not produce income. This is a burdon on their system and actually
costs them money. I had a few problems with them in the past but they have
their act together now and I am really happy with the payment amounts and
they always pay ontime

If you can't get an account with them, stop buying low quality domains
as they won't bring in any revenue anyway.

 

[INVIGOR]

I have to agree about regging crappy names. I applied and got approved in less than 48 hours and only gave 5 or 6 names.

 

[cavemin]

i need one.