I have an interesting story about a panelist that lasted almost 7 years (I no longer have the domain):
--
2001: This is not a set-up letter for an ICANN dispute -- based on what we know, we are not claiming that your have stolen or are squatting on our client's name, although we can't see any reason why you would want this domain name as it doesn't seem to reflect any business you have and just redirects to your *****site. (In fact, I am a panelist for eResolution, see:
http://www.eresolution.com/***** and I teach a law course that covers privacy issues, so I enjoyed visiting your *****site.)
Would you be willing to sell this domain name, and if so, at what price?
--
2007 (note that he used a differnt e-mail address at harvard.edu but I tied it to him via his geneaology web page) : I am interested in buying this site to get the domain name. I am planning a business for baby goods and this name is possibly useful. I
have not selected the final business name that I wish -- it depends on
which domain name I am able to buy. What is your price please.
---
2007 after he was sent to my attorney: *** I am actually traveling at present, and so it will be hard for you >to call me. Can I call you? When is a good time. Alternatively, we
>can arrange a time to speak. I don;t want to waste your time if the >price your client is seeking is out of the ballpark.
---
late 2007 he contacted me again after he knew I was represented by an attorney: Confidential communication
I am an attorney specialising in domain name work in Australia.
See:
http://www.wipo.int/*******
I have a client that wishes to negotiate to purchase of ****
Would you please let me know the price.
This email is sent on a "without prejudice" basis and will not be used as evidence in any UDRP case. I have happy for all communications between us to be on this basis, unless otherwise stated.
--