Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Other
The Watercooler
Politics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="amplify" data-source="post: 2350651" data-attributes="member: 130638"><p>After doing some digging, I actually find agreement with [USER=322979508]@JennBlogger[/USER], and disagreement, on this one, as they are focusing on one policy while doing a sleight of hand on the real issue.</p><p></p><p>The President signed two proclamations on 1/31/2020, one having to do with security and the other having to do with COVID.</p><p></p><p>Before we get into that, it is all an expansion on <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/03/09/2017-04837/protecting-the-nation-from-foreign-terrorist-entry-into-the-united-states" target="_blank">Executive Order 13780</a> of March 6, 2017, or the "Muslim ban" which banned the countries: Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen (but conveniently left out the largest Muslim-populated countries of Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh [<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_by_country" target="_blank">do I need to go on...?</a>])</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/02/05/2020-02422/improving-enhanced-vetting-capabilities-and-processes-for-detecting-attempted-entry-into-the-united" target="_blank">Proclamation 9983</a>, signed 1/31/2020, merely removed Chad from the countries on the list which was amended with <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/09/27/2017-20899/enhancing-vetting-capabilities-and-processes-for-detecting-attempted-entry-into-the-united-states-by" target="_blank">Proclamation 9645</a> signed on 9/24/2017 to include, in the original 6 countries, the highly Muslim-populated Chad, North Korea, and Venezuela.</p><p></p><p>So as you can see, the 1/31/2021 tweet by Pelosi is just more whining about the Muslim ban (which you can see from the amended countries -- Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Yemen, North Korea, and Venezuela -- is far from that). This is where you also get presumably the "brown" from in Joe's tweet:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The other proclamation signed that day was <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/03/04/2020-04595/suspension-of-entry-as-immigrants-and-nonimmigrants-of-certain-additional-persons-who-pose-a-risk-of" target="_blank">Procolmation 9984</a> ("Suspension of Entry as Immigrants and Nonimmigrants of Persons Who Pose a Risk of Transmitting 2019 Novel Coronavirus and Other Appropriate Measures To Address This Risk").</p><p></p><p>P. 9984 blocked entry from China, Hong Kong, and Macau. This is where you got <a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2020/01/31/asia/wuhan-coronavirus-racism-fear-intl-hnk/index.html" target="_blank">all that xenophobia stuff from CNN</a> and the likes as it pointed directly at its now known source.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Add EO 13780, P. 9983, and P. 9645, when the intent behind those three is to protect our citizens from terrorist nations, and P. 9984, you get the perfect storm of "xenophobia/racism" from President Trump.</p><p></p><p>Luckily, all this stuff is still on the web and the President can't pull a Cuomo and wipe it.</p><p></p><p>But agree with [USER=5381]@mr-x[/USER], even though somewhat misguided because these two policies signed on the same day blend quite well. [USER=5381]@mr-x[/USER] is pointing out the hypocrisy of banning African countries due to Covid when Trump did it for China and was called xenophobic. I'm sure, as pointed out earlier, had Trump been in office and done it to African countries, he would not only be xenophobic, but racist as well. Funny how that works...</p><p></p><p>Too much research today. Hope you got something from this as all sauces provided.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="amplify, post: 2350651, member: 130638"] After doing some digging, I actually find agreement with [USER=322979508]@JennBlogger[/USER], and disagreement, on this one, as they are focusing on one policy while doing a sleight of hand on the real issue. The President signed two proclamations on 1/31/2020, one having to do with security and the other having to do with COVID. Before we get into that, it is all an expansion on [URL='https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/03/09/2017-04837/protecting-the-nation-from-foreign-terrorist-entry-into-the-united-states']Executive Order 13780[/URL] of March 6, 2017, or the "Muslim ban" which banned the countries: Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen (but conveniently left out the largest Muslim-populated countries of Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh [[URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_by_country']do I need to go on...?[/URL]]) [URL='https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/02/05/2020-02422/improving-enhanced-vetting-capabilities-and-processes-for-detecting-attempted-entry-into-the-united']Proclamation 9983[/URL], signed 1/31/2020, merely removed Chad from the countries on the list which was amended with [URL='https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/09/27/2017-20899/enhancing-vetting-capabilities-and-processes-for-detecting-attempted-entry-into-the-united-states-by']Proclamation 9645[/URL] signed on 9/24/2017 to include, in the original 6 countries, the highly Muslim-populated Chad, North Korea, and Venezuela. So as you can see, the 1/31/2021 tweet by Pelosi is just more whining about the Muslim ban (which you can see from the amended countries -- Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Yemen, North Korea, and Venezuela -- is far from that). This is where you also get presumably the "brown" from in Joe's tweet: The other proclamation signed that day was [URL='https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/03/04/2020-04595/suspension-of-entry-as-immigrants-and-nonimmigrants-of-certain-additional-persons-who-pose-a-risk-of']Procolmation 9984[/URL] ("Suspension of Entry as Immigrants and Nonimmigrants of Persons Who Pose a Risk of Transmitting 2019 Novel Coronavirus and Other Appropriate Measures To Address This Risk"). P. 9984 blocked entry from China, Hong Kong, and Macau. This is where you got [URL='https://edition.cnn.com/2020/01/31/asia/wuhan-coronavirus-racism-fear-intl-hnk/index.html']all that xenophobia stuff from CNN[/URL] and the likes as it pointed directly at its now known source. Add EO 13780, P. 9983, and P. 9645, when the intent behind those three is to protect our citizens from terrorist nations, and P. 9984, you get the perfect storm of "xenophobia/racism" from President Trump. Luckily, all this stuff is still on the web and the President can't pull a Cuomo and wipe it. But agree with [USER=5381]@mr-x[/USER], even though somewhat misguided because these two policies signed on the same day blend quite well. [USER=5381]@mr-x[/USER] is pointing out the hypocrisy of banning African countries due to Covid when Trump did it for China and was called xenophobic. I'm sure, as pointed out earlier, had Trump been in office and done it to African countries, he would not only be xenophobic, but racist as well. Funny how that works... Too much research today. Hope you got something from this as all sauces provided. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other
The Watercooler
Politics
Top
Bottom