Two posts from other board about this domain and concept:
just thoughts.
i think popup eater concept has a bright future. as long as the company match popup's pay rate, there will be planty publishers want to do business with us. from there, we can pick our field to selling targeted traffic, it will be better return than popup ads, there for we might able charge more for our banner ads.
long time ago there was a guy sent to africa to discover shoe market, he called back " there is no market, no one wears shoes down here!" . the company send another salesman to africa, he calls back " ship me ship load sandles, no one has shoes to wear!"
popup has to go!
i want to eat bunch popups!
join me to eat popups, free food for all!
Joe
Ok, I make roughly $2.00 CPM for pop-unders on my page right now. THat is for raw impressions. I only show popups once per session though. I could choose to show them on all page loads, but I would quickly run out of inventory. Advertisers might only pay for 1000 impressions, and when they are done, no more money from it anyways, and you waste popups.
Now, popuptraffic.com pays $3 CPM for popups. BUT, they charge per unique impression, which brings down the cost of the advertising (well, they might still charge full price, but it costs less to pay us). If you applied that same scheme to banner ads, it might be more possible than you think. If you can sell 1000 banner impressions for $2, then only pay a publisher $2 per 1000 unique impressions, you end up paying alot less.
Say you have 10 advertisers that each buy 1000 impressions. you now have $20 for 10,000 impressions. Now say a publisher runs a joke site or something, where a visitor may see 10 pages each. So to equal that 10,000 impresions, that is 1000 visitors. which would cost you $2. That is an $18 dollar profit for that traffic.
Im not saying Joec's idea is 100 percent going to work. But if you figure it right, it could. I think the biggest problem would be finding sites to run your banners, and advertisers to buy them.
exodus