- Joined
- Mar 29, 2006
- Messages
- 31
- Reaction score
- 0
no offence anyone, but i just saw a dresdner-bank.de or something like that in the section "domains with traffic" and it just upset me.
by attracting and misleading users, you putting my ppc rate down, your traffic is from typo of obvious and notorious trademark.
all ppc companies shouldnt pay for obvious trademark infringement.
to ppc companies, just add to your general agreement, the right for yourself to estimate if the domain name is obviously linked to a trademark, as trademarks can coexist, only focus on notorious ones.
ex: the dresdner bank,coca cola, mickael jackson, ....
i am not putting a general result obligation, but only an obligation of means, to do what you can to limit these ppc unfair traffic abuse.
there are plenty of young lawyers that can help you for cheap (as myself lol)
that will slow also cybersquatting, and limit the unfair commercial advantage made from a trademark infringement against the trademark owner and also against others domainers.
Some trademarks are worlwide and/or territory notorious, ppc on typo of these ones should not be paid.
that will bring money to the others domainers who get natural and honest traffic (by "honest" i mean not obviously infringing any one right) and maybe help the ppc rate to go up.
just upset me that ppc companies also benefit from obvious trademark infrigement.
by attracting and misleading users, you putting my ppc rate down, your traffic is from typo of obvious and notorious trademark.
all ppc companies shouldnt pay for obvious trademark infringement.
to ppc companies, just add to your general agreement, the right for yourself to estimate if the domain name is obviously linked to a trademark, as trademarks can coexist, only focus on notorious ones.
ex: the dresdner bank,coca cola, mickael jackson, ....
i am not putting a general result obligation, but only an obligation of means, to do what you can to limit these ppc unfair traffic abuse.
there are plenty of young lawyers that can help you for cheap (as myself lol)
that will slow also cybersquatting, and limit the unfair commercial advantage made from a trademark infringement against the trademark owner and also against others domainers.
Some trademarks are worlwide and/or territory notorious, ppc on typo of these ones should not be paid.
that will bring money to the others domainers who get natural and honest traffic (by "honest" i mean not obviously infringing any one right) and maybe help the ppc rate to go up.
just upset me that ppc companies also benefit from obvious trademark infrigement.