Reverse domain name hijacking ruling!

[Theo]

Even though the respondent never responded.

 

[Gerry]

Such an incredible insight from one panelist. No valid reason. Pretty incredible since the owner never responded - typically we see such things go against the respondant/owner.

Perhaps Father Domainicus used his heavenly influence in determining the outcome. Me likes to think so.

 

[Theo]

Indeed, he went above and beyond the call of duty.