Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Domain Discussion
General Domain Name Discussion
Showcase .pics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gerry" data-source="post: 2201351" data-attributes="member: 82633"><p>pics has too much competition from photos, photography, and so on. </p><p></p><p>ICANN did (and is continuing to do so) a huge injustice to all these people who run these registries by having them compete against each other for essentially the same product...camera, pics, images, photos, photography. This overlapping is not fair to any of the the registries. </p><p></p><p>I was under the impression that ICANN was not going to permit such closeness and similarities to the extension. But once they saw the bankrolls that they could stuff in their pockets that took all qualifiers off the table. </p><p></p><p>With that said, I do have one <strong>streaming.pics</strong> in my stable, a couple of photos (<strong>webp.photos</strong> and <strong>jpeg.photos</strong>), and a few <strong>.photography</strong>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>My approach to any new tld is to focus in on a specific use or product category. Most importantly, to reg with a specific goal in mind...creating websites. Sure, some are pure speculation and hopefulness that someone would buy them but there are just too many competing with each other to make that the primary goal. </p><p></p><p>product (keyword) + extension = keyword rich sites</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gerry, post: 2201351, member: 82633"] pics has too much competition from photos, photography, and so on. ICANN did (and is continuing to do so) a huge injustice to all these people who run these registries by having them compete against each other for essentially the same product...camera, pics, images, photos, photography. This overlapping is not fair to any of the the registries. I was under the impression that ICANN was not going to permit such closeness and similarities to the extension. But once they saw the bankrolls that they could stuff in their pockets that took all qualifiers off the table. With that said, I do have one [B]streaming.pics[/B] in my stable, a couple of photos ([B]webp.photos[/B] and [B]jpeg.photos[/B]), and a few [B].photography[/B]. My approach to any new tld is to focus in on a specific use or product category. Most importantly, to reg with a specific goal in mind...creating websites. Sure, some are pure speculation and hopefulness that someone would buy them but there are just too many competing with each other to make that the primary goal. product (keyword) + extension = keyword rich sites [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Domain Discussion
General Domain Name Discussion
Showcase .pics
Top
Bottom