All credits had a one year term of service. This would have ended on August 10, 2005 but we extended it to September 30, 2005. All unused credits expired on that date.
If you have any further questions or concerns, please let us know.
There was nothing "Great" about it, and the explanation was simple, Snapnames made a decision to reneg on it's contracts, convert paid funds to "credits" and then expire those at some point, knowing it was just plain and simple theft. They made what they called a "business" decision at the time, meaning they would risk the threat of a suit by anyone who didn't like it rather than refund all of the fees. I guess they thought the worst that could happen was that they would have to pay some smaller amounts back if they lost, (no real big deal for them) and they would just have a few pissed off domainers. Nobody from ICANNt, the registries, registrars or the drop services gives a damn about Domainers anyway, so what's new?mole said:I'm sure there is an explanation to all this, but it sure ain't The Great Train Robbery.
Stocdoctor said:Snapnames made a decision to reneg on it's contracts, convert paid funds to "credits" and then expire those at some point, knowing it was just plain and simple theft. They made what they called a "business" decision at the time, meaning they would risk the threat of a suit by anyone who didn't like it rather than refund all of the fees.
mole said:But to suggest that Snaps is practising plain theft is grossly misinformed, mean and slanderous. Snaps is one of those companies out there in domainland that still believe in the highest of ethics and principles. I've been with them since their first month of inception, nothing has changed where those ethics are concerned. Period.
mole said:A thief grabs your money and runs, not give you a fully cashable raincheck. Big difference.
*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators