trader, i don't think you can buy out an entire extension.
Trader, let me get this straight...so for 100k..i can buy .sex...and own anything and everthing .sex.
I do not think so. 100k/domain not per extension.
Trader, let me get this straight...so for 100k..i can buy .sex...and own anything and everthing .sex. I do not think so. 100k/domain not per extension.
It hasn't been mentioned because it may not even be a factor. If fortune 500 companies have spent the last 10+ years promoting the .com versions of their sites, why would they spend even more money to rebrand? (Especially with a lagging US economy on their hands, money is kind of tight for them as well..) If they were to rebrand, the only winner would be ICANN; the losers are companies that play into ICANN's trap and consumers who will be even more confused than before. If it aint broke, why fix it.. I really don't see any serious impact on the value of existing TLD's. The bottom line is current demand continues to go up while supply shrinks. Unless ICANN passes some kind of eminent domain resolution aka blatant money grabbing technique to "free" up unused domain names through public auctions.... I can't see how we're at a loss.Barely anyone in this thread has mentioned the proposed unlimited numbers of new tld's coming likely next year as a factor.
That is a major negative to the current market and likely will result in less traffic to some other extentions, especially dot-com in the future. A number of big firms will no doubt buy their own extension and may market that more then the .com i.e. www.dell.com vs www.dell
*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators