- Joined
- Aug 6, 2002
- Messages
- 2,455
- Reaction score
- 0
I've been seeing more situations (twice in last 24 hours) where sellers post a name for sale (at a set price) saying either post sold or pm me. Then the first person to post sold is told "sorry that name was sold via pm and before your post" and there is some kindof undocumented timestamp excuse. Have recently seen this with newbies. Seems to me the way we used to do a transaction was to post sold in the thread and then send a pm, or wait for the acknowledment in the thread. The problem with this situation is that a seller can (without proof) just ignore a post of sold for some time and entertain higher offers (shop the offer) via pms here or at other forums. I think this problem (non-documentation and timestamp differences) was one of the reasons this forum went to a "No multi-forum auctions" rule. It appears that a buyer seeing the "post or pm" option in any sale thread can now step over the first buyer by just sending the seller a pm saying "I'll pay you more".
I'd suggest a rule that a seller offering a set price for a name honor the first sold post so the transaction is transparent.
Doc
I'd suggest a rule that a seller offering a set price for a name honor the first sold post so the transaction is transparent.
Doc