- Joined
- May 17, 2002
- Messages
- 2,252
- Reaction score
- 69
Hello,
See:
http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl?sid=03/06/19/2112237&mode=nested
which has some news re: WLS. I expect we'll continue to see more anti-WLS action if/when Verisign tries to push their unwanted service down people's throats. Verisign's best move would be to listen to their customers (registrars) and registrants who on a consensus basis rejected WLS, and unilaterally withdraw the proposal, saving face for both themselves and the ICANN Board, lest they face a monumental defeat in a higher venue that would hurt them even more in the long-term.
ICANN continues to refuse to provide the Independent Review Panel, which was formally requested on September 9, 2002:
http://www.icann.org/correspondence/brannon-letter-to-lynn-09sep02.htm
http://www.icann.org/correspondence/brannon-letter-to-twomey-09apr03.htm
Certainly 9 months is more than enough time to convene an independent panel.
See:
http://www.icannwatch.org/article.pl?sid=03/06/19/2112237&mode=nested
which has some news re: WLS. I expect we'll continue to see more anti-WLS action if/when Verisign tries to push their unwanted service down people's throats. Verisign's best move would be to listen to their customers (registrars) and registrants who on a consensus basis rejected WLS, and unilaterally withdraw the proposal, saving face for both themselves and the ICANN Board, lest they face a monumental defeat in a higher venue that would hurt them even more in the long-term.
ICANN continues to refuse to provide the Independent Review Panel, which was formally requested on September 9, 2002:
http://www.icann.org/correspondence/brannon-letter-to-lynn-09sep02.htm
http://www.icann.org/correspondence/brannon-letter-to-twomey-09apr03.htm
Certainly 9 months is more than enough time to convene an independent panel.