An unusual case. The complainant, "XYZ Flowers LLP", is selling both flowers and DVDs. They applied to U.S. TM for "xyzflowers" in both "Flowers" and "DVDs" classes.
Their application in "flowers" class was denied by USPTO (being similar to another existing TM). As such, they amended their TM application for "xyzflowers" -
now it is in "DVDs" class only. The TM is not yet registered anyway.
The problem is that they are starting UDRP for xyzflowers.com (currently parked with flowers links) and referring to their pending TM application in "DVDs" class.
For UDRP purposes "common law" TMs can be taken in account, but in this case it is not clear - should the UDRP panel agree that they have "common law" rights
to "xyzflowers" mark in connection with flowers even though it is already officially denied by USPTO?
Or, should the panel consider their TM rights (if any) in connection with DVDs only, as this DVD-only activity is listed in the pending TM application?
Does it make sense for Respondent to refer to this "USPTO-denied" fact in the response at all?
Any advise would be greately appreciated!
all names and domains are "maid-up"...
Their application in "flowers" class was denied by USPTO (being similar to another existing TM). As such, they amended their TM application for "xyzflowers" -
now it is in "DVDs" class only. The TM is not yet registered anyway.
The problem is that they are starting UDRP for xyzflowers.com (currently parked with flowers links) and referring to their pending TM application in "DVDs" class.
For UDRP purposes "common law" TMs can be taken in account, but in this case it is not clear - should the UDRP panel agree that they have "common law" rights
to "xyzflowers" mark in connection with flowers even though it is already officially denied by USPTO?
Or, should the panel consider their TM rights (if any) in connection with DVDs only, as this DVD-only activity is listed in the pending TM application?
Does it make sense for Respondent to refer to this "USPTO-denied" fact in the response at all?
Any advise would be greately appreciated!
all names and domains are "maid-up"...