Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="amplify" data-source="post: 2345799" data-attributes="member: 130638">Kind of odd that Chad doesn't go out of his way to say who (if anyone) initiated the hack.With his carefully selected wording, he wants the audience led to believe that it was <a href="https://www.twitter.com/AnonymousOfcl" target="_blank">Anonymous</a> the group. This would be big if it did happen and was them, right? However, for the most part, Anons carry this philosophy:Source: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_(hacker_group)" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>If you know anything about Epik, you would know that it would likely never be a target of Anonymous out of all the domain registrars. With recent events, you probably could take an educated guess on which one would be—but I do not hope that ever be the case, for the privacy of customers and I wish no ill will on anyone.Sounds like Chad is trying to be dishonest to drum up unwarranted fear...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="amplify, post: 2345799, member: 130638"] Kind of odd that Chad doesn't go out of his way to say who (if anyone) initiated the hack. With his carefully selected wording, he wants the audience led to believe that it was [URL='https://www.twitter.com/AnonymousOfcl']Anonymous[/URL] the group. This would be big if it did happen and was them, right? However, for the most part, Anons carry this philosophy: Source: [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_(hacker_group)']Wikipedia[/URL] If you know anything about Epik, you would know that it would likely never be a target of Anonymous out of all the domain registrars. With recent events, you probably could take an educated guess on which one would be—but I do not hope that ever be the case, for the privacy of customers and I wish no ill will on anyone. Sounds like Chad is trying to be dishonest to drum up unwarranted fear... [/QUOTE]

Verification