Website Value Calculator

[wussadotcom]

WVCalculator is a website value calculator with a complete site statistics.
You can estimate your website value and get your site value widget.

Have a look at WV Calculator​

 

[James-A]

Thanks for sharing but i have rarely seen any Best , Accurate website value calculator ! Not too sure on what terms they weigh our website ?

 

[wussadotcom]

Thanks for sharing but i have rarely seen any Best , Accurate website value calculator ! Not too sure on what terms they weigh our website ?

Well, what I am sure is that it can give a pretty accurate for website not based on webmaster niches. And also the suggestions are for websites development terms rather than based on domain or company valuation.
Thats why you'll see web.com appraised for hundred of thousands rather than millions.

 

[ukbackorder]

Is this a random number generator?

 

[wussadotcom]

Is this a random number generator?

Nope, why would you say so?

---------- Post added at 10:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:17 AM ----------

Rechecked: Alexa seems to be an important factor though, see
http://wvcalculator.com/www.alexa.com

As they don't have a ranking it didn't reach the multimillion value normal big sites do.

 

[David G]

Kind of weird how every name I checked says traffic is only 15/day. Also odd why I see zero value on domains which have verified sales of xx,xxx and obviously to anyone worth more than zero even without the sales records.

BTW, alexa.com gets boatloads of traffic and not 15/day and is worth much more than only 128k.

Nope, why would you say so?

---------- Post added at 10:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:17 AM ----------

Rechecked: Alexa seems to be an important factor though, see
http://wvcalculator.com/www.alexa.com

As they don't have a ranking it didn't reach the multimillion value normal big sites do.

 

[Aleksandar]

Some stats such as "site age" are totally incorrect.

 

[wussadotcom]

Kind of weird how every name I checked says traffic is only 15/day. Also odd why I see zero value on domains which have verified sales of xx,xxx and obviously to anyone worth more than zero even without the sales records.

BTW, alexa.com gets boatloads of traffic and not 15/day and is worth much more than only 128k.

Yeah, well I suppose its more to estimating
And I already mentioned it before, it evaluates the website not the domain

Thats why you'll see web.com appraised for hundred of thousands rather than millions.

For domain valuation valuate.com should be more appropriate I suppose ^^
Cheers

@Aleksandar - can you give an example.thanks

 

[David G]

I realize such tools are not that accurate but how in the world would it estimate one of the most active sites on the web alexa.com gets only 15 page views a day? However, the tool reports Alexa.com has Yahoo Backlinks reported of 2,086,394 so how is it possible the tool thinks with over 2 million backlinks it could only get 15 page views? Makes no sense at all. Plus, other sites I know getting good traffic were also reported at 15/day.

With such hard to understand gross inaccuracy you would be better served not even trying to estimate traffic. Better yet, why not use a different method of judging the traffic? In addition, I fed it a valuable keyword name (3 words long) which is a nice website and recently sold for over 50k but it reported a value of zero! Sorry, but with such staggering inaccuracy I really feel your site has little if any value unless major improvements are made.

Yeah, well I suppose its more to estimating
And I already mentioned it before, it evaluates the website not the domain
For domain valuation valuate.com should be more appropriate I suppose ^^
Cheers

@Aleksandar - can you give an example.thanks

 

[Aleksandar]

An example is a site of mine that isn't online for longer than 2 months, domain itself isn't older than a year. The tool reported that the site's age is well over a year, almost two. Which is impossible since the domain itself isn't that old, yet alone the site which is way younger.

I don't want to advertise anything, so use any of your (or friend's) recently made websites and pull it through.

 

[wussadotcom]

I realize such tools are not that accurate but how in the world would it estimate one of the most active sites on the web alexa.com gets only 15 page views a day? However, the tool reports Alexa.com has Yahoo Backlinks reported of 2,086,394 so how is it possible the tool thinks with over 2 million backlinks it could only get 15 page views? Makes no sense at all. Plus, other sites I know getting good traffic were also reported at 15/day.

With such hard to understand gross inaccuracy you would be better served not even trying to estimate traffic. Better yet, why not use a different method of judging the traffic? In addition, I fed it a valuable keyword name (3 words long) which is a nice website and recently sold for over 50k but it reported a value of zero! Sorry, but with such staggering inaccuracy I really feel your site has little if any value unless major improvements are made.

I don't really understand the first part? Were you referring to alexa.com as an example just like I mentioned before? Also it seems like it is also using compete.com stats.

 

[David G]

I don't really understand the first part? Were you referring to alexa.com as an example just like I mentioned before? Also it seems like it is also using compete.com stats.

I have absolutely no idea why you don't understand this? I am sure it's obvious to anyone was referring to researching alexa.com and other sites from your own own site - the one with the link in post 1. This makes no sense at all. What does compete.com have to do with this anyway? Compete.com reports about 2 million visits a month at alexa.com, not 15 a day. Maybe it's a random number generator as asked by RobM in post 4. Maybe others can chime in? Why are you not doing that anyway? I am outta here for good.

 

[ukbackorder]

So what you're saying is that the tool is nowhere near accurate as it's values bear no relation to *reality*? Not exactly a useful tool then. Will file it with all the other pointless 'estimators' out there - in the trash.

 

[wussadotcom]

So what you're saying is that the tool is nowhere near accurate as it's values bear no relation to *reality*? Not exactly a useful tool then. Will file it with all the other pointless 'estimators' out there - in the trash.

Well not really, one of my site got a pretty accurate evaluation. News site with general traffic. Anyway thanks for the awesome review
I'll try and see if there are any more parameters that can be included in the future.