Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Other
The Watercooler
What is a "Struggle Session" and why we should avoid them at DNForum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="amplify" data-source="post: 2347325" data-attributes="member: 130638"><p>I've read, but you're still failing to comprehend. I cannot take you by the hand to do this. Either do it, or don't, and stop. It's just getting old.</p><p></p><p>Yes, I needed to point out that I was on payroll there, and that I was a paid staff member and not just a moderator. The lines are blurred between the two. I was paid to write, moderate, and bug test. It's telling that you have a reading and comprehension problem now because I gave you my username on NamePros (N-A) previously, and again, where you can see my contributions to the NamePros blog when it was first introduced. If they take them down, they will forever be achieved on the early pages (1-5ish).</p><p></p><p>About the ban, they permanently banned N-A without my knowledge. I tried to reappear as ExcellentPicks and that account was banned for having more than 1 account (which is allowed here) and because I was permanently banned.</p><p></p><p>Would you like me to disable replying to threads for a "cool down" period as they're doing there?</p><p></p><p>I don't like that approach because this gives everyone the chance to speak at once, and as a forum, refresh and reply to everyone at once by multi-quoting. Stopping the discussion stops the dialogue that can be helpful because people get bored of waiting.</p><p></p><p>Rethinking this... it might be the way that NamePros closes the thread that makes me not think it's fair. I'm thinking they manually do it so that moderators can catch up, even though members still want to engage. I'm thinking for a small side project, as DNForum will emerge and once again have activity, and hopefully, very engaging and active threads again, that we should develop an automated tool to take the bias (corporatism) out of the equation.</p><p></p><p>Instead of locking threads for staff members to catch up and cherry-pick, I'll try to design a system that detects multiple posts and then locks the thread for an automated cool-down period, reopening it when the time is up. Innovative and takes the bias out of it.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for kind of giving this community a suggestion, [USER=322979341]@DapperJohn[/USER] . <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="amplify, post: 2347325, member: 130638"] I've read, but you're still failing to comprehend. I cannot take you by the hand to do this. Either do it, or don't, and stop. It's just getting old. Yes, I needed to point out that I was on payroll there, and that I was a paid staff member and not just a moderator. The lines are blurred between the two. I was paid to write, moderate, and bug test. It's telling that you have a reading and comprehension problem now because I gave you my username on NamePros (N-A) previously, and again, where you can see my contributions to the NamePros blog when it was first introduced. If they take them down, they will forever be achieved on the early pages (1-5ish). About the ban, they permanently banned N-A without my knowledge. I tried to reappear as ExcellentPicks and that account was banned for having more than 1 account (which is allowed here) and because I was permanently banned. Would you like me to disable replying to threads for a "cool down" period as they're doing there? I don't like that approach because this gives everyone the chance to speak at once, and as a forum, refresh and reply to everyone at once by multi-quoting. Stopping the discussion stops the dialogue that can be helpful because people get bored of waiting. Rethinking this... it might be the way that NamePros closes the thread that makes me not think it's fair. I'm thinking they manually do it so that moderators can catch up, even though members still want to engage. I'm thinking for a small side project, as DNForum will emerge and once again have activity, and hopefully, very engaging and active threads again, that we should develop an automated tool to take the bias (corporatism) out of the equation. Instead of locking threads for staff members to catch up and cherry-pick, I'll try to design a system that detects multiple posts and then locks the thread for an automated cool-down period, reopening it when the time is up. Innovative and takes the bias out of it. Thanks for kind of giving this community a suggestion, [USER=322979341]@DapperJohn[/USER] . :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other
The Watercooler
What is a "Struggle Session" and why we should avoid them at DNForum
Top
Bottom