Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Other
The Watercooler
What is a "Struggle Session" and why we should avoid them at DNForum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="amplify" data-source="post: 2347328" data-attributes="member: 130638"><p>I'm not going to implement a bunch of rules that seriously look like laws (oh, by the way, now that you find more interest in me, I was the lead on gathering and compiling the NamePros rules into paragraphs, sub-paragraphs, etc.).</p><p></p><p>I think that was the downfall of NamePros to be honest. Everything had to be black and white; follow rule 1.2.6 or get a warning.</p><p></p><p>I've discussed rules here with [USER=143534]@robmonster[/USER] before and we've come to just one rule; the golden rule: Treat others as you would like to be treated. We'll have a one-paragraph "rules" page instead of a mind-bending rules page that makes you want to get a lawyer involved to determine if you're breaking a rule or not.</p><p></p><p>That said, I have not treated you as I would like to be treated, and let me take this time to apologize and address the rest of your post.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I made your use of attempted propaganda on DNForum connect to the propaganda about Ivermectin to show other, logical thinking people, what you are attempting to do. People can see right through it now, because you have not shown the full picture, only what you want to show, even though citing the source where it came from. I said that was eerily similar to the Ivermectin propaganda, as that would be the latest in which people would remember.</p><p></p><p>I bring up corporatism because I do not want conformity here on DNFourm. For as much as I want you to think and act like me, I do not want to force you to think and act like me with rules that make it so. Just keep it simple and treat people how you would want to be treated.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Handling it as I see fit. If you have any criticisms, create a suggestion thread and suggest for more than 1 simple rule.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="amplify, post: 2347328, member: 130638"] I'm not going to implement a bunch of rules that seriously look like laws (oh, by the way, now that you find more interest in me, I was the lead on gathering and compiling the NamePros rules into paragraphs, sub-paragraphs, etc.). I think that was the downfall of NamePros to be honest. Everything had to be black and white; follow rule 1.2.6 or get a warning. I've discussed rules here with [USER=143534]@robmonster[/USER] before and we've come to just one rule; the golden rule: Treat others as you would like to be treated. We'll have a one-paragraph "rules" page instead of a mind-bending rules page that makes you want to get a lawyer involved to determine if you're breaking a rule or not. That said, I have not treated you as I would like to be treated, and let me take this time to apologize and address the rest of your post. I made your use of attempted propaganda on DNForum connect to the propaganda about Ivermectin to show other, logical thinking people, what you are attempting to do. People can see right through it now, because you have not shown the full picture, only what you want to show, even though citing the source where it came from. I said that was eerily similar to the Ivermectin propaganda, as that would be the latest in which people would remember. I bring up corporatism because I do not want conformity here on DNFourm. For as much as I want you to think and act like me, I do not want to force you to think and act like me with rules that make it so. Just keep it simple and treat people how you would want to be treated. Handling it as I see fit. If you have any criticisms, create a suggestion thread and suggest for more than 1 simple rule. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other
The Watercooler
What is a "Struggle Session" and why we should avoid them at DNForum
Top
Bottom