Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Other
The Watercooler
What is a "Struggle Session" and why we should avoid them at DNForum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fried" data-source="post: 2348262" data-attributes="member: 322957690"><p><strong>Rob seems keen on using <em>his </em>forum to propagate lies</strong> (eg. Lying about the nature of the duplicate nP member account ban to support his false struggle session narrative) meanwhile Twitter members are out there doing Gods work.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=twitter]1450607493562843136[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>Really, it's a shame that Robs playbook seems to entail creating a pattern of doubling down on misinformation to support false narratives. Not only in this latest example of Rob mischaracterizing the duplicate nP acct ban, but last year as well, when Rob attempted to exploit his PRO status on namePros, to call BS on WIPO UDRP thuggery using a domain with a rather checkered acquisition history:</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.namepros.com/threads/bc30-com-udrp-lost-by-namepros-member.1177875/#post-7642578[/URL]</p><p></p><p>Rob says:</p><p></p><p></p><p>Ignoring Robs attempt to exploit his position within the nP community, there is a gross issue with the information Rob provided (false statements) to WIPO UDRP and with the facts that actually happened. The CEO of Epik submitted,</p><p></p><p>Rob says:</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>When in fact, the domain BC30.com was registered</strong> <strong>in 2011</strong>, not by Rob Monster, but <strong>by Michael Bush</strong>. A simple WHOIS History check will confirm this. Thus, presenting a serious concern of trust, when it comes to what actually happened, and what narrative Rob Monster/Epik is trying to spin. The actual narrative in what had happened with BC30.com appears much more embarrassing to/for Epik/Rob.. eg</p><p></p><p>namePros member says:</p><p></p><p></p><p>So one has to ask, why is [USER=7550]@Rob[/USER] monster risking his credibility by making clearly false statements on easily verifiable information? I want to believe him on some issues, but when he is so clearly making a mockery of the truth, it really is hard to believe any of the other stuff he says.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fried, post: 2348262, member: 322957690"] [B]Rob seems keen on using [I]his [/I]forum to propagate lies[/B] (eg. Lying about the nature of the duplicate nP member account ban to support his false struggle session narrative) meanwhile Twitter members are out there doing Gods work. [MEDIA=twitter]1450607493562843136[/MEDIA] Really, it's a shame that Robs playbook seems to entail creating a pattern of doubling down on misinformation to support false narratives. Not only in this latest example of Rob mischaracterizing the duplicate nP acct ban, but last year as well, when Rob attempted to exploit his PRO status on namePros, to call BS on WIPO UDRP thuggery using a domain with a rather checkered acquisition history: [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.namepros.com/threads/bc30-com-udrp-lost-by-namepros-member.1177875/#post-7642578[/URL] Rob says: Ignoring Robs attempt to exploit his position within the nP community, there is a gross issue with the information Rob provided (false statements) to WIPO UDRP and with the facts that actually happened. The CEO of Epik submitted, Rob says: [B]When in fact, the domain BC30.com was registered[/B] [B]in 2011[/B], not by Rob Monster, but [B]by Michael Bush[/B]. A simple WHOIS History check will confirm this. Thus, presenting a serious concern of trust, when it comes to what actually happened, and what narrative Rob Monster/Epik is trying to spin. The actual narrative in what had happened with BC30.com appears much more embarrassing to/for Epik/Rob.. eg namePros member says: So one has to ask, why is [USER=7550]@Rob[/USER] monster risking his credibility by making clearly false statements on easily verifiable information? I want to believe him on some issues, but when he is so clearly making a mockery of the truth, it really is hard to believe any of the other stuff he says. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other
The Watercooler
What is a "Struggle Session" and why we should avoid them at DNForum
Top
Bottom