Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Other
The Watercooler
What is a "Struggle Session" and why we should avoid them at DNForum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DomainsGENERAL.com" data-source="post: 2348279" data-attributes="member: 322978425"><p><strong>To me, this is nuts. I don't see any lie, nor any problem with what he said, here.</strong></p><p>You want so much to make him look bad that you will try to twist absolutely anything (If it needs to be said, even if I find always this a little dumb: He isn't perfect, like most of us). This makes YOU look bad, because you indeed don't seem honest. Maybe you even believe yourself the BS you're peddling.</p><p></p><p><strong>Was "an objective voice of reason" banned, or not?</strong> Well, "objective voice" is Rob's opinion, but was the account banned, yes or no? It seems, as per [USER=5381]@mr-x[/USER] post above, that you even actually can have a secondary account on NP if you pay. In any case, NP could have let the account continue, at least until this discussion was over. It was their choice to ban it (as it was their choice to let me participate for months on a non-residential IP until they used this as an excuse to ban me).</p><p></p><p>The fact is that they choose to let some accounts continue, whatever may be going on (IP, duplicate account, etc.), and they choose to stop some when it says some things they don't like and they prefer to stop (sometimes with BS excuses which aren't even true, what we cannot be sure about for the supposed "duplicate" part). So the second highlighted sentence is totally true too, IMHO. Even if it was indeed a "duplicate" account.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DomainsGENERAL.com, post: 2348279, member: 322978425"] [B]To me, this is nuts. I don't see any lie, nor any problem with what he said, here.[/B] You want so much to make him look bad that you will try to twist absolutely anything (If it needs to be said, even if I find always this a little dumb: He isn't perfect, like most of us). This makes YOU look bad, because you indeed don't seem honest. Maybe you even believe yourself the BS you're peddling. [B]Was "an objective voice of reason" banned, or not?[/B] Well, "objective voice" is Rob's opinion, but was the account banned, yes or no? It seems, as per [USER=5381]@mr-x[/USER] post above, that you even actually can have a secondary account on NP if you pay. In any case, NP could have let the account continue, at least until this discussion was over. It was their choice to ban it (as it was their choice to let me participate for months on a non-residential IP until they used this as an excuse to ban me). The fact is that they choose to let some accounts continue, whatever may be going on (IP, duplicate account, etc.), and they choose to stop some when it says some things they don't like and they prefer to stop (sometimes with BS excuses which aren't even true, what we cannot be sure about for the supposed "duplicate" part). So the second highlighted sentence is totally true too, IMHO. Even if it was indeed a "duplicate" account. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other
The Watercooler
What is a "Struggle Session" and why we should avoid them at DNForum
Top
Bottom