Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Sedo.com

What penalty for transferring a DN that I don't own

Status
Not open for further replies.

Honan

Level 9
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2003
Messages
3,943
Reaction score
4
Further to the new ICANN registrar transfer policy, that insists a DN be transferred to a different registrar, just by a request from anyone, and no reply from the owner for 5 days;
What would be the likely penalty if I was to start requesting DNs (those DNs that I know have defunct email addresses for owners ) be transferred to me at an account with a different registrar?
 

jberryhill

Philadelphia Lawyer
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Messages
2,571
Reaction score
4
Depending on your jurisdiction, it is some flavor of fraud - when you request the transfer, you are affirmatively representing that you are authorized by the domain registrant to initiate the transfer. The fact is, you are not so authorized. You are therefore obtaining a thing of value by means of a knowingly false assertion.
 

MediaHound

Former DNF Admin
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2004
Messages
4,159
Reaction score
8
Plus, you wouldn't make many friends here.
 

Honan

Level 9
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2003
Messages
3,943
Reaction score
4
Thank you kindly Jberryhill.
Clear and concise advice, as usual.

Yes, of course Media
However, expect thousands of people do it at Godaddy as of 11/11/04
 

jberryhill

Philadelphia Lawyer
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Messages
2,571
Reaction score
4
Oh, there is no doubt that it is going to happen on a massive scale.
 

fatter

Level 8
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2003
Messages
1,301
Reaction score
4
I screwed up a year ago when consolidating my domains and requested a name I let expire by accident, 6 months after that the new owner called me up and threatened to sue, after I checked out my paperwork i realized godaddy transferred it to me, this guy is a law student at harvard I have since been trying to give it back to him kept my latest emails but he doesnt submit the request for a transfer back, I have traffic going to 404 error in the meantime. He said godaddy should just reclaim it for him being they allowed transfer, My point is with new system there will be inadvertant
transfers even typing wrong letters.
 

Dave Zan

Level 8
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
1,700
Reaction score
10
anyweb said:
Thank you kindly Jberryhill.
Clear and concise advice, as usual.

Yes, of course Media
However, expect thousands of people do it at Godaddy as of 11/11/04

Not just Go Daddy, but every other registrar out there, especially those (if
any) who don't provide locks.

Kindly inform as many as you possibly can about this. You can bet there are
still many out there who aren't aware of it.
 

Theo

Account Terminated
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Messages
30,317
Reaction score
2,217
Not sure if you read the policy carefully. Only new registrations are affected; existing domains will be affected as of June 12, 2005.
 

fatter

Level 8
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2003
Messages
1,301
Reaction score
4
my rgistrar now offers free domain lock, i beleive its because of new policy, they also changed name from domain lock to Transfer secure, we can now change DNs without unlocking domain, that used to take an hour or more just to unlock, change dns and then relock again
 

ssanders

Level 4
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2004
Messages
114
Reaction score
0
So if there is a domain I want, that is not mine, however, it is not an active website, and hasn't been for years... I can't request a transfer?

(I thought that was the whole point of the new rule...the purge the squatters)
 

dotNetKing

DNF Addict
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2002
Messages
1,550
Reaction score
0
I still remain unsure about the actual mechanics of this.

At the moment, I normally have to give *two* authorisations - first, the *gaining* registrar requires my authorisation, and *then* the losing registrar.

Do we not still have that safeguard of the admin e-mail having to give authorisation to the *gaining* registrar first?
 

jberryhill

Philadelphia Lawyer
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Messages
2,571
Reaction score
4
(I thought that was the whole point of the new rule...the purge the squatters)

Good Lord, no, that was not the point of the rule. The point was to enable registrants to pry their own domain names away from "sticky" registrars who were arbitrarily denying transfer requests. The point was most certainly not to enable theft of domain names due to extended hospital stays, vacations, etc. on the part of registrants.
 

Theo

Account Terminated
Joined
Feb 28, 2004
Messages
30,317
Reaction score
2,217
Is a lock as good as the EPP code for non COM/NET domains?
 

Dave Zan

Level 8
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2004
Messages
1,700
Reaction score
10
RADiSTAR said:
Is a lock as good as the EPP code for non COM/NET domains?

Theoretically (no pun intended :) ), the lock should be good because even
if, say, the auth code is retrieved and submitted along with the transfer-in
request to the gaining registrar and confirmed there, the lock disables any
transfers from taking place.

Depending on the registrar, the only way to remove the lock is to log inside
the domain name account and manually turn it off. Although the registrar has
the power to do that, they don't have the authority to just turn it off unless
they somehow gain consent from the registrant in the manner they see fit.

Ultimately, it still depends on the registrar.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members Online

Sedo - it.com Premiums

IT.com

Premium Members

MariaBuy

Our Mods' Businesses

UrlPick.com

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators

Top Bottom